Come on let's stay on point, I never said they
don't care about regs. I said that sites
don't make the money from regs and they
don't care as much as you think. I said sites make their money form deposits, and they like the multitabling regs that take depositors money and multitable and pay it
back to the sites via faster
rake. Keeping tons of regs on the site paying tons of
rake allows sites to get the money from deposits faster than if the
fish played by themselves. It's a food chain. Without deposits, sites die, and that makes the depositors the most important part of the chain and if Huds become a problem for sites to gain deposits then they will ban them. That is all I was trying to say, let's not twist the debate that the thread was originally about.
Don't let the fact that paying $5K in
rake a month vs some 1 tabling
fish that deposits $200 a month and 1 tabling cloud your judgment that regs are the more important part of the food chain, there needs to be far more deposits than withdrawals every single day for a site to earn
rake.
Originally Posted by jyms
