Why is there still no EV equation? Im not bullshitting you...
pot odds/
implied odds all comes
straight from an EV calculation. If you want to know how often you can do something based on certain information you
set up an EV equation, and make it look like the thing you want. I know you havent done one yet because you would have run into several problems based on the information given including what
villain has the other 40% of the time.
You also seem to be traveling down a pretty dangerous road ogre. Poker is played against people, and people are constantly changing and adapting. I have 20k hands on
pokerstars, and i was a way different person now than i was at the beginning of that 20k hands. At around hand 11k, i stopped cbetting like a
monkey, so my average cbet% is probably much higher than what it is in reality. So even though you may have some data that says in the past
villain had a
set here 60% of the time...that doesnt
tell you shit. The reason is that
villain likely changed somewhere there and what your looking at is an average of his play, but not an accurate depiction of what his play currently is. Suppose
villain is good, then hes on 2p2 and ftr and is constantly improving and changing (hopefully...). Suppose
villain is bad, then maybe he recently watched Tom Dwan
bluff Phil Ivey for more than 500k and now thinks poker is all about bluffing. Bottom
line: YOU CANT USE
STATS LIKE THIS. If you continue to youre only gonna find yourself losing, because even robotic players update their code once in awhile.