lol funny how this thread died right after two posts that were like "this thread has potential"

Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
When playing deeper bet-sizes do not have to be altered as long as our range is expanded. Having a wider range decreases our opponent's implied odds thus making many seemingly correct PF/Flop calls actually incorrect.
by this, do you mean if we widen our garbagy range, then that lessens their implied odds because they'll be c/f'ing to air a lot when they miss?

i've started to think about this a lot lately with PF 3b'ing/4b'ing sizes. it seems like we should want to bet bigger as a bluff to assure that they fold, and we're screwed when they call a 4b when we hold A7o even if we are IP. at the same time, though, they have ZERO implied odds against us, so they're actually making an even bigger mistake set-mining only to c/f on 8/9th's of boards.