Hi all,
I just read Doyle Brunson's book and I found it very inspiring. However, I would not be THAT aggressive. Am I wrong or the way he used to play is not quite recommended nowadays?
I'd be glad if you share your thoughts about it.
Cheers,
Raoni
|
03-19-2009 07:02 PM
#1
| |
| |
|
03-19-2009 07:58 PM
#2
| |
reading the beginner's digest would probably be more helpful than doyle's book. | |
|
| |
|
03-19-2009 09:16 PM
#3
| |
Doyle is one of the finest poker players of all times. Even though he doesnt share all his "secrets" and his style doesnt really suit micro-stakes- you can learn a tremendous amount from him. | |
| |
|
03-20-2009 05:41 PM
#4
| |
![]()
|
sad but i hate reading books (6) |
| |
|
03-20-2009 09:42 PM
#5
| |
| |
|
03-20-2009 11:51 PM
#6
| |
Welcome to FTR. You have to understand where Doyle was coming from. That style of play does indeed still work but only against the right set of opponents. Back then there were no Internet players and the overall style of play was much more passive. A maniacal strategy can kill games like that. That's not to say he now plays with a passive approach, he's just a bit more selective about it. | |
| |