For those of you who didnt read the other thread, HERO had a read on the villain as a floater who can have a very wide range here and would bet the turn if checked to. Default line is obviously to lead the turn. My definition of a floater is someone who calls flop bets in position with the intention of stealing the pot later on in the hand if his opponent shows weakness. Will often do this with a draw which means he can win the hand by hitting his draw or by stealing it if his opponent shows weakness. Also known as delayed bluffing.

Lets assume villain is a floater who knows what he is doing.
If we lead the turn strong ($50+) again we have announced to villain that we like our hand and that we are more than likely willing to play for stacks here which leaves villain with a easy decision (becomes a pot+implied odds problem) and allows him to play perfectly against us (our hand is quite easy to read given the UTG raise + flop bet + turn bet). In this particular hand villain had a lot of outs because the turn gave him an open ended straight draw with his flush draw so villain would probably call (pot odds would be 2:1 or better and his odds of hitting his draw is about 2:1 so if he can extract some value on the river when he hits it becomes +EV). If hero overbets the pot so as to give villain incorrect odds villain will fold (this is a bad play by hero though because villain will have trips\full house here a small % of the time and fold the rest of the time). By checking (feigning weakness) and inducing the semibluff hero has tricked villain into paying $50 for his draw and keeping the betting open which allows hero to raise all in and charge villain another $79 to hit his draw. Even though from villain's perspective it looks like he didn't make a mistake hero has effectively layed villain 1.35:1 odds on hitting his 2:1 draw. The mistake villain made was betting the turn when checked to, which appeared to be +EV because villain was under the impression that he had folding equity with the bet.