Differences between 100NL FR and 200NL FR?

I am currently 12 talbing 100NL FR on stars. Ive been a winner at the game for 100,000 + hands and I want to move up to 200NL soon. I am somewhere between 2-3 ptbb/100 hands 12 tabling and run about 15/7.

I want to know what adjustments I should plan on making when I get to the $200 tables. Should I cut down on tables to about 8 at first? Do you recomend opening up at all or will I be able to just TAGG it up?

Anyone who plays this level now or has made the transition at any point recently, I would like to hear some differences (if any) at the new level.
Thanks in advance.

I tried it, broke even, went back to 100nl.

I think a major difference is that there are less players willing to call off a lot of chips with hands that 100nl players don't mind. I think there is more raising postflop, and more attacks at weakness. gl

the move up from 100 NL to 200 NL wasnt too bad for me. Play is definitely better, more aggressive and less complete tards. However, there are still enough players who limp with Q10o UTG and call raises. The toughest part for me was handling the swings of money as a poor college kid a couple buy-ins at 200 nl make a difference. The way i got past the transition was playing 4 tables of 100 NL and 2 tables of 200 NL. After i became comfortable i went 2 of 100 and 4 of 200 and then finally all 6 at 200. GL in your transition.

I found the transition from 100 to 200nl FR to be one of the easiest, but that was at FT about 6 months ago. GL

anyone know if it's a similar change in 6max?