|
|
 Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
Thats ridiculous.. Minimum betting and overbetting the pot are very useful in certain situations. For example you can make it look like you are buying a pot when you have a hand or overbet against an opponent scared to lose his stack. Varying bet sizes adds a lot of complexity.
fine. i still don't think it adds that much more complexity. the minbet and overbet are just deceptive plays and with reads it's easy to see through them. it's only a problem when your opponent knows that you know that they know what you think you think they're doing. in that case just flip a coin.
Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
tell me what pokersite I can see someone winning/losing $100k in one evening playing limit poker?
and which site would this be for NL? just because you CAN lose that much reloading all the time doesn't mean you will, or should.
Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
Uhm, yes they do go down in value..an ordinary flush draw is not something you go all in on, so his comment is correct.
with the chances of improving, the chances they will fold, going all in is a very powerful move. top pair is a monster heads up, and he fails to take that into account.
-------
generalizations mean nothing. we could argue this silly limit vs NL argument forever and still draw no conclusions.
|
Reply With Quote