Difference between learning and being told what to do.

Originally Posted by Rondavu

It's important to focus less on the how, and more on the why when teaching poker. We're not building a house, we're building a thought process.

Perfectly said. I think there's much more to be got out of Hold 'Em strategies than there is in Hand Histories.

I agree that it's important to state why, plus I also think that hand histories could be expanded on a bit more... e.g. questioning things like what you do if the opponent bets rather than checks, etc. in order to come to an overall conclusion that can apply well to similar situations in the game, rather than just "Raise flop, raise turn and call a push".