Quote Originally Posted by Hornstar
However, for me anyway, I study some of my hands and I genuinely don't know if it was the right play or not and whether I should have folded or not/raised or not/been in the hand at all.
That's fine, it's not really what I am discussing here. That's more in depth analysis in the game which by all means is welcome.

Quote Originally Posted by salsa4ever
However, that said what experience do you have as a teacher?
--To validate my first post I guess I should tell you I have taught golf for a living the past three years. However, poker is a different animal than any other game.

The top results (excluding the newest thread) were a sportsbetting thread, lukie's thread of randomness, winner's circle, operation 75k, time to legalize online poker, new 19 hand play chart, and swiggidy's blog. I couldn't find what the guy was looking for. As a law student and stockpicker myself I'd live to have your research skills. Wouldn't mind if you could share them with me... or would you rather have me search for it?
No doubt the search engine can be difficult to use if one isn't a computer tech. However, it will work if one uses quotations and limitations.

Good post. Polite too .


Quote Originally Posted by Pelion
I think the biggest problem with this forum as far as your argument goes is when people post 1 line answers to questions with no reasoning behind them at all.
This is no doubt what this post is backhandedly getting at. I see veteran members getting tired of answering the same questions and in essence it affects their posts as a whole. This somewhat surfaced in SSHE a little while back. What are the veteran members getting out of posting here and helping out? Well unless there are some good debatable subjects, not much really.