Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Developing Non-Showdown Winnings

Results 1 to 23 of 23
  1. #1

    Default Developing Non-Showdown Winnings

    In what ways can you increase your Non-Showdown Winnings? More bluffs or floating? Im having trouble bringing my non-showdown winning graph go up
  2. #2
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    value bet thinner
  3. #3
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    Value betting yields showdowns.. from the initial topic I think he doesn't want a showdown.
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  4. #4
    Muzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,315
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Be more agressive
    Perhaps change ur standard open raise from 3bb to 4bb
  5. #5
    kmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,612
    Location
    Not Giving In
    Quote Originally Posted by Ragnar4
    Value betting yields showdowns.. from the initial topic I think he doesn't want a showdown.
    Value betting thinner yields more folds. Most players check behind too much.
  6. #6
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    Quote Originally Posted by kmind
    Quote Originally Posted by Ragnar4
    Value betting yields showdowns.. from the initial topic I think he doesn't want a showdown.
    Value betting thinner yields more folds. Most players check behind too much.
    sounds fair.
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  7. #7
    Pick on the weak, tend to avoid confrontations against strong players with marginal hands.
  8. #8
    Solving this riddle is easy, how you adjust to winning more showdowns will be a problem. I spent all of the last two weeks trying to adjust, just to stop spewing in non showdowns. I have a new problem.

  9. #9
    I just looked at this graph for my database and was surprised I was up less than a buy-in for non-showdown winnings while over the same period I was up 13 buy-ins for showdown winnings. Given that I've been picking on weak players so much lately it made me think.

    Then I realized that folding your SB/BB is a non-showdown loss.
  10. #10
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Yeah, blinds count in your non-showdowns. I'm running about dead even over 7k hands in non-showdown winnings. Wish I could pinpoint my changes, but not folding as much probably helped me.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  11. #11
    i wanna see a rly solid players stat
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  12. #12
    Keilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    660
    Location
    Northern BC, Canada
    yo wtf at fold BB being non-showdown loss.
  13. #13
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by Keilah
    yo wtf at fold BB being non-showdown loss.
    It's a loss, and it's not at a showdown, so this is pretty straight-forward.

    Running about break-even at non-showdown is fine, fwiw, as long as you're up at showdowns.
  14. #14


    Sustainable?
  15. #15
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow
    Quote Originally Posted by Keilah
    yo wtf at fold BB being non-showdown loss.
    It's a loss, and it's not at a showdown, so this is pretty straight-forward.

    Running about break-even at non-showdown is fine, fwiw, as long as you're up at showdowns.
    is less than 1bbs/100 acceptable for the nits out there like me?
  16. #16
    what are your most prominent strategies for creating these non showdown winnings fnord? nice graph
  17. #17
    bluff shove every river obv
    3k post - Return of the blog!
  18. #18
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    Quote Originally Posted by badgers
    bluff shove every river obv
    this is a huge leak since you should be bluff shoving most turns.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    Quote Originally Posted by badgers
    bluff shove every river obv
    this is a huge leak since you should be bluff shoving most turns.
    this is not as effective since you will inadvertantly suckout and win sometimes.
    3k post - Return of the blog!
  20. #20
    I managed to get my non-showdown winnings from badly negative to near breakeven by:

    Picking better board textures to c-bet / double barrel
    Picking better villains to c-bet / double barrel
    Being more selective about c-betting/bluffing in general
    Floating c-bet bots in position more & punishing their predictability.
    Tightening up a little preflop.

    The last one worked for me because I was pretty loose preflop and ended up in marginal spots vs loose shortstacks where I c-bet a lot with trash or 2nd pair no kicker and had to give up a lot of raised/cbet pots.
  21. #21
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Great point dozer. I think one problem a lot of developing TAGs have, is they c-bet like monkeys. Learning that its ok to not c-bet when you dont think its good to do so can really help.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    I think one problem a lot of developing TAGs have, is they c-bet like monkeys.
    Yes this was me for quite a while. Just insta c-betting with no thought of range, fold equity, board texture, etc...

    Definite spew. But having been that way for a while, I understand the mindset of the regs I find with like 80% cbet flop. It's the 50%-60% cbet types I worry more about now. Don't like floating em' so much, but still will with a showdown value type hand.

    Exploiting predictable villains is fun
  23. #23
    frosst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    905
    Location
    count-n mah monies stewie-style
    steal more blinds and 3bet more preflop

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •