|
It depends on the possible (Reverse) Implied Odds you're getting, and not just pre-flop odds!!!
Remember too, implied odds (and reverse) are not just a function of your opponent's stack size, but also a function of so many other things:
- how your opponent(s) plays post-flop - aggression, likelihood of slow-playing/setting traps, folding easily to 'strength', reads., etc ......
- the possible range of hands you can credit your opponent(s) for and how your hand and their hand(s) connect with the board
For example, given a range of hands you credit your opponent for, you estimate your pre-flop odds with AK are '2:1 dog', then in the long run, yes, you should ensure you that on average you are getting at least 2:1 on your money *going in* in those situations. BUT, if you are, on average, playing mostly against bad opponents (or ones with inferior post-flop skills than you) then you should be able to make extra money in enough/many situations to under-write some looser calls when you aren't getting 2:1 on your money pre-flop. i.e. your hand connects with the board better than your opponent's but they still pay you off huge even when it would be obvious that you have them beat to better player.
It's about EV right, so I don't think you can just look at the the pre-flop match-up odds to make a clear cut rule about AK in all game situations.
|