And as has been said if you're going to insist thathis range is sets+ then obviously both AA and 22 are a fold, and using "22 is the same as AA" is lol and pointless. It's a terrible assumption to make since you've given us no reason to believe that's the case. Feel like this thread is wasting everyone who's trying to help's time and should be locked sicne OP is convinced he knows what his opponent's range is and isn't remotely interested in addressing important counter points that people are giving their time to produce.