Quote Originally Posted by biondino
The 97% cbet stat is giving me pause for thought. Do we all accept that this isn't optimal, even for a nitty strategy, at $200NL? However, if you were programming a bot to play as simply as possible while maintaining expected value, you would, I guess, have it cbet a large amount..
Why would you program a bot to play as simply as possible? How would you get 97%, anyway? Always c-bet unless flop is monotone and we don't have one of the suit? Or is it checking 97% randomly?

97% seems so far from optimal, that it's probably evidence AGAINST a bot, and FOR a person playing 8 tables who can't make super deep decisions in 30 seconds.
I mean - if there's one thing a bot can do that a person can't it's make straightforward decisions incredibly fast.