Cbetting
Actually the "would you cbet in a 5 player pot" does have a yes answer, which the moment you asked made me realise just how much I have overused the cbet in situations where it wasn't for the best. I generally don't cbet into a dangerous flop unless I'm last to act/second to last and it's been checked to me. With no one behind/only one person behind I've been acting on the idea that, at these limits anyway, someone who is slow playing the nuts/second nuts is going to c/r me more often than just c/c. Is this the wrong attitude to take? Am I losing too much in the long term by trying to steal pots on a scary board? As for someone who calls my bets, I *eventually* wake up and slow down.

HUD
So I guess with HUD it is like watching Negreanu/Williams having pros lay down hands against them. Just because you know that someone plays with less than optimum hands doesn't mean that this time is the time they actually have the nuts - Incidentally I've noticed that in a MTT this indecision on my part comes up a lot. From what you've been talking about in this thread I think that means if I get in that situation I'm playing too many hands against these types of players in the same way/or not listening to their change in play. Is that right?

AK/AQ/Preflop
I generally try to keep my preflop raise the same (on another note do you find it better to have it a set amount or include an extra bet for each limper?). With the Ax vs AK type situation, is it just by "feel" that you can tell they are pushing too hard and to call their raises? I'm good on implied odds (I think) but it's when I'm being bet into on pot odds looking for my higher kicker to draw that I'm shaky on.

If I have 6 outs, that means (for sake of easy math) I have a 6*4 - 24% chance of getting my card on the turn or river. So does this mean my call must be more than 24% of the pot in order for me to justify calling if I know I need that card? - I used to be really good at maths but over the years it's in-one-ear and out-the-other.

BB
So whenever someone talks about BB in NL, it's double the big blind. Which means if I'm raising 3xbig blind I write it as 3bb but if my winrate is 3BB/hr I'm winning 6 big blinds every hour?

Tabling
I remember reading Spoonitnow's thoughts on how to increase tables so I'll definitely take your advice and start now. I'll need to take it slow as I've already caught myself getting flustered if having to make more than one decision at the same time. Is this where the HUD makes up for lack of 100% focus?

So you change tables often? If so, would you say this helps keep you fresh and/or is keeping your winrate higher than it would be if you stayed at the same table for 3hours+?

Short-handed/6-max.
I know there has probably been huge discussions on this but what are your thoughts with the pros and cons of playing full-ring and/or 6-max? Is it possible to be great at both or would it be better to just focus on one first? I've never really tried 6-max but I like the idea of being involved in hands more yet I also like the full-ring more stacks, more time to pick my spots.

Villians range
With my range I think I know where I stand on most parts. There are a lot of people at this level who bet heavy with bottom/mid pair on the flop (thinking back, it's most likely the texture because of the draws there too) and unless I've caught something I usually back away. But I am worried I'm not maximizing my potential winnings here by being slightly too cautious.

I guess right now my biggest deal following that thought is that I feel comfortable when I'm taking the lead in a hand. But if someone is bringing me the action (unless I've got nuts/near nuts) I'm usually unsure of where I stand even with knowing their range. Should I become a calling station and "suckout" because they've allowed me to get in for cheap. I'm pretty sure this is something I have to work on working out.