|
|
 Originally Posted by Penneywize
Man spoon I am really doing my best here. I would argue with you if I saw a point, but I'd be arguing about language and not so much poker; and hey, this is your thread so I' m auto-wrong anyway aren't I? :P
I could pm you if you really wanted to hear more about this but I doubt it would accomplish much.
You're heads-up in position on the river with a bluff catcher. Your opponent goes all-in with a polarized range of nut hands and bluffs.
Suppose you have 60% equity against his range.
How much equity would you have if he bluffed twice as often as he does now?
|
Reply With Quote