I was wondering how most of you prefer to bet in Texas Hold em no limit between betting half the pot with top pair vs matching the pot with top pair...in a heads up situation. Now I know alot of you will probably say you should mix up your betting. But I think that mixing up your betting between betting half the pot and matching the pot may give my opponent information about my hand. Does anybody agree with that? Here are some of the reasons I stick with betting half the pot heads up.

1:Betting half the pot heads up doesnt usually give my opponent pot odds to draw out on me (Considering I believe im very good about laying down my hand when I beleive im beat,so I usually dont give my opponent reverse implied odds, rememeber im a very tight passive player).

2:If I bet half the pot as opposed to matching the pot. And my opponent has something on the flop that im unaware of at that time, like a set or two pair,im giving him less money during that hand

3:Its kinda slowplaying in a way because only a maniac is goin to chase when you match the pot. However alot more players will chase if I only bet half the pot. So ill get more action. So you might say "Thats true, but what if your opponent hits? Well obviously*, anytime someone is drawing against you theyre drawing because theyre behind you in the hand,which means im the favorite, and so they might outdraw me some* times. But most* of the time, theyre not goin to hit.

So now I would appreciate some other insight about why this may or may not be wrong. And remember this is a heads up,me having top pair say like aces in the ho, type situation.