|
 Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
 Originally Posted by Chopper
i know this is not popular, but i disagree that stars is tough.
i have played there for over a year and a half, and its my best/softest sight. i carry a much higher winrate there than anywhere else i have played.
dont like absolute (rocks), pokerroom (no action), ultimate bet (that may be variance, i think the players are bad, i just cant beat them for some reason...they showdown crap). have not tried bodog, but hear its good for crappy players. fulltilt is my 2nd best site; have consistently posted a winning rate there, though not more than a couple BB/100.
once party disappeared, stars and fulltilt got the majority of their traffic...thats where the fish went, you may have to play at lower levels, though. why would i play at 100, if my winrate is 8-10 at the 25 NL tables, and only 1.5-2 at the 100's? less risk, same or a little better profit.
What is your BR chopper?? 1 1/2 years? you should be lighting up $100NL. and have at least $2500 or more.
OOP?? stay off stars or Full tilt. Seriously, why waste a first deposit bonus to play $10NL tables, go play pokerroom, prima skins or Cryptologic skins. Get rakeback, don't sign up anywhere or download any new sites without knowing where to get it, and play $10NL. Find sites tha have bonuses that clear at $10NL and start grinding out a bankroll. P.S. to anybody that doesn't know, Bodog is out for Canadians.
sorry took so long, jym.
i did play regularily at 100 NL after grinding through 10, 25, and 50 for over 20k hands each to monitor win rates. i have a roll of over 3k (built it from a "borrowed" $25 from my brother, and had the $3k in just over 14 mos. i grinded until the br was high enough to max out sign-up bonuses and went and got them before the US ban), mostly from bonus-chasing, and about 2-4 BB/100 play over 140k-ish hands, maybe as high as 5/100 cant remember exactly, as i bought a new laptop and never transferred the stats.
i play low nowadays because the bonus chasing no longer exists for me in the US, and i loathe the "rock hunting" at 50 NL and am not a fan of the "blind aggression" at 100, although i still beat those games modestly, but not great. 200, i dont have the roll for, and no longer care. i would rather beat the hell out of the 10's and 25's, play a looser and more aggro game, and not worry in the least about my bankroll anymore.
i'm not burned out, i just cannot stand all the rock tights leftover from the US reg situation. i cant tell you how BORING poker is w/o fish around. i can grind it out with anyone, but not for 1-2 BB's/100 when i can take 10-12 off the 10's. its simply more fun. i was never in poker to become a pro, or even get great, just in for the bonus chase, and entertainment value...it just happens i learned a bit about playing by reading FTR, others, and being a natural nit...lol.
i know that doesnt make sense to most of you guys here on FTR because you guys absolutely LOVE poker. i do too, but i enjoy playing goofy, maybe jumping from NL to limit to SH, and still winning (although i dont at SH...yet ), and it's a lot harder (for me), and stressful, above 50 NL.
fwiw, i LOVE kicking A**, and you (by that i mean, I) just cant do that above 50 anymore (i guess i never pwned the games up there anyway).
however, and i know you didnt say this, jsut because i play lower doesnt mean i have no credibility in my thought processes. they just come from a no fold em, hold em standpoint.
|