I went from $47 to $229 in 7k Hands
Then went from $229 to $83 in 10k hands
Total hands are 57k.
I really have no idea why.
Time to bite the bullet and move back down before all my BR is gone.
Not real happy about it either![]()
01-20-2009 02:20 AM
#1
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 02:40 AM
#2
| |
01-20-2009 02:45 AM
#3
| |
I saw a guy named sasquach on FT the other day at 100NL, I hope it wasn't you lol. Isn't $83 too little to even play 5NL following proper bankroll management? | |
01-20-2009 02:47 AM
#4
| |
01-20-2009 04:12 AM
#5
| |
| |
01-20-2009 04:59 AM
#6
| |
Stepping down limits is the smartest thing you can do in a situation like this, and it definately isn't easy. Good job moving down, you'll thank yourself in the end because you're on route to saving your bankroll. Variance sucks but it's something we all have to deal with whether we like it or not. | |
01-20-2009 07:54 AM
#7
| |
you should be playing 0.01/0.02 NL with that bankroll right now | |
| |
01-20-2009 08:39 AM
#8
| |
My thought is you may not be following good enough bankroll management guidelines. I strongly recommend 30 buyins for whatever NL you are playing and then dropping when you hit 20 buyins at the level you're at, NOT 30 buyins for the level below. So, to even play $10 NL, you need $300 and from the original post, I infer that you were playing @ $229, if not sooner. Furthermore, you mention playing $5 NL with your current bankroll and I think you should be playing $2 NL and NOT $5 NL until you reach $150 and dropping down to $2 NL if you reach $100. So, it's doubly concerning that I infer by the title of this thread that you have been playing $10 NL the entire time, when you should have dropped to $5 NL when you dropped to $200. | |
| |
01-20-2009 11:08 AM
#9
| |
I guess I need to clarify something. The numbers above are NOT my bankroll. These are my profits of 5NL and 10NL combined. My current BR is at $180. I was advised at a BR of $220 to take a shot at 10NL. | |
| |
01-20-2009 11:31 AM
#10
| |
There's certainly nothing wrong with nitty BRM, but I think you can be more liberal at the micros. Taking a shot there is fine imo, but I would move down a little sooner. | |
| |
01-20-2009 12:03 PM
#11
| |
Since you clarified, I guess you're not as far off the path as I thought, but I still think you should only move up when you hit 30 buyins and move down as soon as you hit 20 buyins for the level you're at. To me, that's not nitty or too conservative and I wouldn't bend the rules because it's micros. If you bend the rules, ALWAYS bend them to be more conservative. It seems like the majority of threads I read where people have to move down, they either didn't follow bankroll management at all OR the rules they followed were too liberal like 15 to 20 buyins for NL. Much less frequent is the player who follows a 30 buyin or more strategy who finds himself having to move down one or more levels. Losing your money or bankroll or moving up too soon is a MUCH bigger problem than possibly having more money than you need for the next level or moving up too late. EVERYONE has a glass ceiling on how far up they can move before there are either no more games or a level they can't beat. Poker is EVERYWHERE 365/24/7, so don't be in too much of a rush | |
| |
01-20-2009 12:07 PM
#12
| |
You play 6max only, right? Have you posted stats or anything? If you have HEM I could look over a small database or something. | |
01-20-2009 12:11 PM
#13
| |
Here are some hands. I believe I edited out whether it was obvious if I won or lost. In general, I would lose to Laggs and win against Taggs. I'll post stats later when I can get to HEM. | |
| |
01-20-2009 12:29 PM
#14
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 01:04 PM
#15
| |
Hand 1 | |
| |
01-20-2009 01:43 PM
#16
| |
More info: | |
| |
01-20-2009 02:02 PM
#17
| |
hand 1: fine, 10 outs to the nuts and he doesnt always have the flush. If he obviously has the flush I may fold this since he has nothing behind. | |
01-20-2009 02:24 PM
#18
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 02:59 PM
#19
| |
I haven't looked at the chart but preflop depends so much on the table you are at, if it's a static chart you shouldn't be using it. | |
01-20-2009 03:18 PM
#20
| |
That sucks about moving down but hey its what you gotta do to keep your bankroll. Hopefully you will catch a good upswing!!!! It really sounds like your just on a downswing. I would only get worried if you get to the point where you have to go down to 2nl. If that happens (which i doubt it will) then i would be asking for help and reading a lot of strategy and maybe rethinking a lot of plays/hands going through hand histories and such (not saying you shouldnt do that now) but really don't worry about it until you lose all your profit and your at 2nl. Good luck to you | |
| |
01-20-2009 03:49 PM
#21
| |
I know what it feels like to move back to 5NL after losing a lot of your bankroll. Best advice I can give you is to really look deeply at your hand history and try to identify any major leaks in your game. | |
| |
01-20-2009 03:50 PM
#22
| |
| |
01-20-2009 03:56 PM
#23
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 03:59 PM
#24
| |
Not even close. You know there are more than one type of someone right. that is still too much by the chart | |
01-20-2009 04:03 PM
#25
| |
| |
01-20-2009 04:05 PM
#26
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 04:05 PM
#27
| |
AJs is awesome PF when limped to you in position, raising against a maniac, hijacking, among other things. | |
01-20-2009 04:08 PM
#28
| |
| |
01-20-2009 04:28 PM
#29
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 04:39 PM
#30
| |
01-20-2009 05:27 PM
#31
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 05:50 PM
#32
| |
| |
01-20-2009 06:10 PM
#33
| |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
you know his wife? |
01-20-2009 08:08 PM
#34
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 08:10 PM
#35
| |
Stats | |
| |
01-20-2009 09:16 PM
#36
| |
01-20-2009 09:57 PM
#37
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 10:05 PM
#38
| |
Yea red line drops a little fast but your biggest problems are preflop. You limp or call too often, you don't raise enough when opening, you don't threebet enough which allows players to fold correctly because you always have a great hand, and when they don't fold they have enough implied odds knowing you are stacking off to sets and two pairs way too much. | |
01-20-2009 10:12 PM
#39
| |
01-20-2009 10:18 PM
#40
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 10:19 PM
#41
| |
01-20-2009 10:33 PM
#42
| |
| |
| |
01-20-2009 10:40 PM
#43
| |
This is the position image: | |
01-20-2009 11:05 PM
#44
| |
This is only for 10NL | |
| |
01-21-2009 10:53 PM
#45
| |
Stats added for 5NL and 10NL | |
| |
01-21-2009 11:27 PM
#46
| |
Guest
|
as you can see, your EP and MP stats SUCK |
01-22-2009 01:45 AM
#47
| |
| |
| |
01-22-2009 01:45 AM
#48
| |
01-22-2009 04:32 AM
#49
| |
up your stealing... you don't steal at all | |
| |
01-22-2009 11:16 AM
#50
| |
| |
| |
01-22-2009 11:44 AM
#51
| |
![]() ![]()
|
stealing is VERY important. in late position with only blinds and maybe 1 limp caller, raise it up. worst comes to worst if high cards come they'll put you on top pair and you take down even more than the blinds. works for me anyways. sure you will have the occasional hard ass who is determined to catch you stealing, but you have to lose some to win some as they say! |
01-23-2009 12:38 AM
#52
| |
Guest
| |
01-23-2009 01:10 AM
#53
| |
| |
01-23-2009 08:02 AM
#54
| |
Nice post sir, but I would question whether choosing one style and one game is beneficial to one's poker growth. | |
01-23-2009 11:36 AM
#55
| |
Funny how these "I'm not talking about anyone in particular" posts seem to follow my posts around... | |
| |
01-23-2009 11:48 AM
#56
| |
Guest
| |
01-23-2009 06:03 PM
#57
| |
What Spenda says is true. What IOPQ says about AQo is not. The only thing I didsaggree with Spenda is the Hud. I don't liek guys having all those numbers on their Hud but VP$P and PFR are OK in my books. I think it helps you form ranges preflop, allows you to learn to play differently vs certain opponents and will make you adjust preflop to the table and seat position instead of using a damn hand chart. Now, as long as you cna do that without a Hud, go ahead. | |
01-23-2009 09:08 PM
#58
| |
filter to UTG | |
01-23-2009 11:18 PM
#59
| |
i love spenda! | |
| |