Autorate Rules

Anyone use different priorites for autorate rules then some of the common ones. Looking to rate in priority of:

1. Showdown Muppets - just don't know when to fold and lose at SD. Chances of knowing I'm up against a SDM make me feel as though winning % is better then average.
2. Weak Tight - Don't like to go to showdowns. Usually bet it out to prevent showdowns or fold with the better hands in signs of aggression. Also only take VERY STRONG hands to the end.
3. Calling Stations - the usual, love to call and go to showdowns, and do win unlike SDMs.
4. Ultra Aggressives - pushy people and the "Maniac"
5. Extra Loose - high VP$IP but none of the above.
Then categorize by VP$IP & Total Aggrssion Factors for Tight, Loose, and Semi-Loose as well as Aggressive, Neutral, & Passive with no priorities.

With the set I've been using lately, I'll run into allot of extra-loose types but they vary from your "maniacs" and "ultra-fish". My thinking is if you can sort of "categorize" the players first into showdown potentials then the ultra aggressive and loose players. This way you know ahead of time whether they will bet & raise, fold, call, win, or lose as it gets closer to the showdown.

I wish PT had a extra symbol/icon to rate Weak Tights by "Good" (Low WSD% and High W$@SD%) vs "Bad" (Low WSD% & Low W$@SD%).

http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...light=autorate

i haven't looked into this^, but, i really just look at their stats, not so much what pt rates them.

This is generally the site and rules most players are using now if you want to have icons and descriptions attached to the numbers on your PT and Hud. http://www.andymcnish.btinternet.co.uk/newauto.htm

They have 6 max and FR stats and they are quite different so get the right ones.