Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
cbetting 55% isn't high, in fact it's somewhat low compared to most TAGGfish and probably around optimal in my mind..
i'm interested in this, especially cos TAG-fish is a label i can identify with. I'm 16-12 over the last 60k hands and have been c-betting around 50%. This is heavily reduced from a previously typical 60-65%, and I think i have overcompensated.

Care to elaborate?