The more I think about it, the more I am curious as to what kind of $/hour somebody running 3 tables of this can pull in. It's not fun, it's not poker, but it's simple and easy to do with 3 tables over multiple hours without fatigue or tilt (you can only lose so much at a time with small stacks).

Against decent players, it wouldn't work. You just wouldn't get enough callers calling you down without premium goods. You'd mostly pick up the blinds/limper money, and when you did get challenged, it would be a something equally solid. You would slowly lose money over time, IMO.

But on Fishy Poker, people will call a small stack going all-in with non-ace non-pocket pair hands. A small stack doesn't get that much respect, and the gamblers know that all they can lose is 6-10 bucks or whatever your stack is. The maniacs can't give you any trouble. They can call you, but they can't re-raise you. It's just a matter of how many A7o and KQo and KJo etc. hands you can get the fish to call you with.

I play poker for fun, not money. I have a good job. Playing 3 tables of this all-in stuff wouldn't be fun, but I'm damn curious as to what the $/hour of 3-table Jupiter is over the long term.

Also curious as to whether it would work in the $50 rooms, or if the fish just aren't as plentiful there. If enough gamblers exist in the $50 rooms it just might work there as well, or work even better in terms of $/hour.

If anybody is planning on trying this for an extended experiment, please keep us posted on the results. I've got friends working for possibly less $ per hour than they could make playing monkey poker.