All BR In Play

Originally Posted by Deanglow

Thanks for your contribution Slevin, but you are completely wrong.

Thunder - Playing with your entire roll separated on 20 or so tables is fine. If you are comfortable with the 20BI rule and with 20 tables then it is no different from 2-4 tabling. I personally play 24 FR tables but with 50BI because I am more mentally fit with going broke on 3-4 tables at once.

This. I would also like to add that leaning while playing 6+ tables (of full ring, less for 6-max) isn't a great idea. So if you are playing with a 20buy-in bankroll than you are probably playing the microstakes so 20tabling 2nl with a $40 roll isn't a great idea. This is of course if you subscribe to the "increase the number of buy-ins you play with as you increase stakes" philosophy. I hope this makes sense...?

All BR In Play

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Threaded View

Posting Permissions

07-30-2008 01:32 PM #11
animal_chin View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date Jun 2006 Posts 479 Location On the grind slavin' daily.	Originally Posted by Deanglow Thanks for your contribution Slevin, but you are completely wrong. Thunder - Playing with your entire roll separated on 20 or so tables is fine. If you are comfortable with the 20BI rule and with 20 tables then it is no different from 2-4 tabling. I personally play 24 FR tables but with 50BI because I am more mentally fit with going broke on 3-4 tables at once. This. I would also like to add that leaning while playing 6+ tables (of full ring, less for 6-max) isn't a great idea. So if you are playing with a 20buy-in bankroll than you are probably playing the microstakes so 20tabling 2nl with a $40 roll isn't a great idea. This is of course if you subscribe to the "increase the number of buy-ins you play with as you increase stakes" philosophy. I hope this makes sense...?