|
 Originally Posted by xpaand
I would've raised a bit on the river. If you give him a range of 11%, then add Aces with weak kickers, you get about 20% (is that reasonable). Assuming that's a good range to put him on, you have 62% equity. Question (cause I honestly am not sure): how much should you bet with that equity?
hard to say. we expect to win 62% of the time if we just check it down. But how often is a bet going to be +EV? If he only calls an all in bet with hands that beat us, then betting that much is obviously -ev. not betting means everything continues but we dont get any value out of weaker hands that might call anyway. So we need to find some kind of middle ground where we bet an amount that gets us a call from enough weak hands to justify losing money to stronger ones. For instance,
Say his range is {KQ, A3, and 75}. This is clearly way over simplified and is in no way is exact range. This is just being used for the purposes of this example. He checks, so we decide to......
well...crap. what we do? If we bet, he folds all combos of 75 (no option to reraise). But he may call with KQ, and A3. 9 possible KQ hands, and 6 possible A3 hands (again, no option to reraise). Because of the 75 hand, we were ahead of his checking range (72% equity), but without this hand calling a bet, we are now BEHIND his calling range (47% equity). How do we then proceed?
|