Quote Originally Posted by kmind View Post
Villain is semi-unknown but seems very fish so far running 27/0 after about 19 hands. I noticed that he wasn't a maniac postflop but wasn't too passive either. With those reads I usually go into the "Oh he can easily raise with an overpair/A9 here then" but I don't know.

In hindsight I do not like my flop bet size. I was hoping to just get a flat call and in my head at the time was "please don't raise". If I bet more on the flop and he raises is it more of a b/f? Enlighten me, BC.

No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

MP ($36.35)
CO ($30.91)
Button ($26.30)
SB ($25.10)
Hero (BB) ($25.35)
UTG ($51.19)

Preflop: Hero is BB with A, A
UTG bets $0.50, 2 folds, Button calls $0.50, 1 fold, Hero raises $1.75, 1 fold, Button calls $1.50

Flop: ($4.60) 9, 6, 5 (2 players)
Hero bets $3, Button raises $8.25
I'd like to see a bit bigger raise pf but its not really horrible. He has 13-1 to try and hit a set. I always just make the same 3-bet against min-bets as I do against 3x opens.. it puts them in the tough spot. If you think about it, one of the main reasons to be a min-raiser pf is to get set odds if someone repops it. Don't let them get away with their plan.

At face value it looks like a tough spot, but if you look at it closely its probably a fold unless you have some read.

If the money went in here we wouldn't be good that often. We are drawing basically dead to a ton of stuff that calls your shove.. 3 sets, a straight, two-pair. Even if he has some crap like 98 he is getting the right price to call even if he knows we have AA.. The only thing we beat is a FD which has an ass ton of equity.