Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

6m vs FR, rake?

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging

    Default 6m vs FR, rake?

    I've been bouncing back and forth between 6m and FR. It's mainly because I've been running bad, but it's forcing me to do a lot of thinking about the pros and cons of both.

    I had been meaning to check the difference in rake, since we play more hands(vp$ip, not /hr) in 6m. At 25nl, I pay $22/1k hands in FR and $27/1k hands at 6max. This is over 19k and 16k sample sets respectively. Does anyone have any better samples to back these up?

    At that rate, I'm losing an extra 1ptbb/100 at 6max vs. FR!
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  2. #2
    Its only cause you're going to be playing more hands in 6max than full right cause the blinds come around faster. Pick one grind up a big bankroll and as you move up the rake becomes smaller and smaller compared to your winrate.
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    if you're running better you pay more rake (the total rake is the rake taken from hands won, right?)
    check average rake/pot for FR and divide by 10, do the same for SH and divide by 6. Are they different? if so, whatever - it doesn't matter!
    Play the one you have a better earn-rate with!
  4. #4
    BankItDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    8,291
    Location
    Losing Prop Bets
    ummmm can't we figure out the differences between the two tables using six's, nine's, hands played, and division signs? Or am I missing something here?
  5. #5
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by BankItDrew
    ummmm can't we figure out the differences between the two tables using six's, nine's, hands played, and division signs? Or am I missing something here?
    you may be on to something...
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  6. #6
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    Since the calculation is per hand, the 6s and 9s are irrelevant (or understood).

    Since the rake caps out at higher limits I would assume that this becomes less and less relevant as you move up. Therefore, at micros, it's better to play FR, as you move up, it becomes more of a tactical choice. The issue is that I don't have any stats to back this up, because I'm only at 25nl.
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  7. #7
    You play from the button more in 6m, so it should offset the bigger rake.
  8. #8
    Only if you play the BU well, which I suspect our resident 14/10 TAGS may not be. You have to play position to a 1BB/100 advantage to offset the rake. Post flop skill becomes a factor that we need to measure, yes?
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •