Quote Originally Posted by Belt
Even for 30 hands of a sample size is more than enough to say that this guy is loose passive and post-flop AF is more of a proof for this.
It would be valuable here to have looked at his AF by street but I don't have it on my HUD. He was loose-passive pre, but loose-aggro post and I'll tell you why I'm thinking that.

Like I said, he was involved in many hands past the flop. Let's even be conservative and say he saw a turn with half the hands he saw a flop with, which is at least 44% of possible holdings. The post-flop AF of 0.9 says he's betting or raising nearly half the hands where he puts money in or around 21% of all possible holdings. He bets or raises with more hands than are in my entire pre-flop range.

With such a huge range, he's probably got every single two-diamond combination in there and probably some straight draws. If he's drawing, do you still think it's cool to call his initial raise and evaluate the turn?