|
 Originally Posted by KeeKoLy
 Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
Why? (I believe you are correct, but for my sake and the sake of others, lets discuss why)?
Well, the thing is this. While we are very likely to have the best hand at this time, are we going to be ahead of the range of hands villain calls the flop raise with? In this case, it depends. And I think we do have a good chance of being ahead, as it's a limped pot, and it's kinda coordinated. So I don't hate a raise. However, we have to keep in mind that our hand is kinda weak. If we raise, and villain 3bets the flop, we have to fold, which obviously sucks.
Also, we could potentially be driving out hands that we would be able to extract value from on later streets. For instance if villain folds 87, 98, 88 here, then we have possibly missed out on another street, or two, of value. In theory, we should bet or raise if we have greater than 50% against the range of hands villain is calling with, UNLESS we stand to have a higher expected value by checking/calling and getting value on later streets. With a hand such as this, I think we likely stand to make more money by calling and either inducing bluffs on later streets, or getting thin value. Rather than building the pot in a multiway flop with a relatively weak holding.
Also, what range of hands that we beat do we expect villain to call the raise with, and put money in on later streets (when we are still ahead)? I mean, it's villain dependent, but I would expect them to not continue incredibly light.
|