|
|
 Originally Posted by oskar
Without reads this is an easy call imo unless you think you can discard KQ, AK.
There's close to 0 chance I lay this down against anyone but the nittiest.
And slevin, you should know better than to post results by now.
Micro... every second thread you're trying to talk people into making retarded laydowns without giving any reason.
I' m not big on posting pokerstove shit, because everyone can and should do it for themselves, but...
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 56.619% 56.14% 00.48% 1408 12.00 { AcAd }
Hand 1: 43.381% 42.90% 00.48% 1076 12.00 { JJ- TT, 55, AKs, KJs+, JTs, AKo, KJo+, JTo, 98o }
Remove the retarded semi- bluff (89o), and this is still an easy call.
How is this a retarded laydown? In general, if you're facing an unknown, you're not going to be getting check/raised into too lightly. If you see the same guy c/r'ing often then its probably safe to say a pair is good.
Anyway your range is also kind of fucked (like usual). How is AK showing up here more often than KQ which you failed to include?
We do have decent equity though, but I was saying: how often is worse than 2 pair c/ring us. I never said its a insta-fold since I didn't run the ranges through stove, and I stand corrected that this is a call.
|
Reply With Quote