|
Not at all. I have MP2's range on the flop after his tiny c-bet as: 99-22,AQs+,ATs,KQs,AQo+,KQo (which is his preflop range minus the hands that make an overpair, top pair or a set, because I argue that he doesn't gay bet these hands on this board). Against this range I have 68.7% equity. Even if there are more second pair hands in the range like KT and QT, which I doubt he raises preflop with, I am still a favorite. Even if I add stupidly slowplayed sets to his range, I am still a favorite. I'd say SB's continuing range is similar to MP2's after his c-bet, but roughly 3/4 of his flop checking range folds.
You called to set mine. You missed. Fold.
It's true I called to set mine, I missed and I'd normally fold. I certainly would fold to a normal sized C-bet but here I saw a cheap opportunity to win a small pot, may well be it was wrong.
Why create a scenario where you might be ahead in order to justify putting more money into the pot? It's 5nl. KISS. In general, stay out of uncertain situations and let the opponents beat themselves.
Can you please give sensible street by street ranges that I am not ahead of, or explain why the ranges I gave are unrealistic, or if the ranges are OK, why I should always fold? You may be right that I should play ABC at 5nl, which is what I was doing at 2nl. But so far I found the 5nl FR games on Full Tilt incredibly nitty/weak tight compared to 2nl. I find it also next to impossible to get seats at the looser tables, they all have super long waiting lists, unlike 2nl where it's really easy to get a good seat. Does tight ABC, rigorous "fit or fold" really work at 5NL? Is pure set mining really profitable with all these nits? If it's OK to steal the blinds in position, then is it really always wrong to steal a flop or float here and there?
So as you may have guessed, I didn't fold. Let's imagine that you foolishly decide that it's worth continuing. Would you prefer to raise or call and what's the plan?
|