2NL (lol) - AQs flop laydown?

Villain has only been at table for a few hands. Laying this down seems really w/t at this level, especially without some sort of read that he isn't a complete tard. Thoughts?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (8 handed) internettexasholdem.com

Hero ($2.58)
BB ($4.07)
UTG ($1.71)
UTG+1 ($3.27)
MP1 ($2.60)
MP2 ($4.34)
CO ($4.73)
Button ($4.18)

Preflop: Hero is SB with , .
UTG calls $0.02, UTG+1 raises to $0.08, 4 folds, Hero calls $0.07, 1 fold, UTG calls $0.06.

Flop: ($0.26) , , (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 bets $0.1, Hero raises to $0.4, UTG folds, UTG+1 raises to $2.2, Hero???

Final Pot: A few chicken mcnuggets

I'd call at these stakes.

I don't like checking the flop though, I'd like to see a pot-sized bet here.

A check/raise over reps your hand.

If he still wants to play for stacks after that its a pretty easy fold unless hes a maniac.

...especially without some sort of read that he isn't a complete tard

I need the tard read to get it in here. He raised preflop so that makes the random 2 pairs less likely. Theres still plenty that beats you though.

I'd say fold. Looks like qq+.

I don't see a fold here at 2NL. Sorry but 2NLer's shouldn't get any respect.

Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan

I don't see a fold here at 2NL. Sorry but 2NLer's shouldn't get any respect.

from what i remember 2NL is fairly passive. Passive players dont push over a checkraiser with TPTK.

readless i fold. With an LAGgro read i call.

he had the other two queens, didn't he?

Why doesn't villian have Qx here? Clearly it's in his range.

At 2NL, my read is 'tard' until proven otherwise. Call ALL DAY.

Originally Posted by BankItDrew

he had the other two queens, didn't he?

I don't know, I folded.

I would prob call.

3bet pre-flop

Originally Posted by Schoolaments

Final Pot: A few chicken mcnuggets

NH