Since I never limp the BTN, over-limping is clearly covered.

I'm not by any means claiming that the following thought processes are correct, but I'm throwing them out there for criticism.

I think that being the aggressor IP is more important than card value more times than not. As such, if I have any value in my hand (~41% PFR), I'm going to raise a field of limpers who already told me (by limping) that they do not have a strong hand. If I don't have any value in my hand, then I'm folding, obv.

I'm never calling (or over-calling) a min-raise on the BTN. If they are capable of raising more than min, then they have just told me they have a less-than-strong hand. Same as a limp. Furthermore, they have defined their pre-flop ranges in another category (fold, limp, min-raise, raise ~3.5x), so I can narrow their post-flop ranges even more. In response, I 3-bet my entire opening range IP, fold valueless hands (same as limped pots).

I can see merits to over-calling a 3-bet IP w/ { QQ-99 }, maybe throw in { KQs,QJs,JTs }.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated.