|
|
 Originally Posted by Carroters
Yeah this is what I thought. The 2nd one was mainly because I felt pocket pairs 22-1010 were a reasonable part of his range, although I actually think aces and fds make up much more of it now that I look at the hand again.
One other thing I don't like about these hands that is villains high fold to c bet stat, mainly in hand 1. We can draw from this surely that villain's range for calling the flop will be much stronger and more weighted towards top pair and draws. If a villain calls us on the flop with a high fold to flop c bet stat, this should be a deterrent from double barrelling, thoughts?
why do you care if 22, 44-66 fold on the turn? If you think you're folding out 22-TT but not JJ-QQ you're getting TWO better hands to fold: 88 and TT
the rest you will beat at showdown
of course, you might get bluffed by a lower pp on the turn or river if you check
but then you've only invested $2.1 in the pot
if you are betting into an ace you'll have invested $5.3
considering you're not beating much anyway, it's not like you have a lot of equity to protect by betting anyway, you're only ahead of the flush draw
and you'll feel totally ridiculous if the guy calls the turn with a flush draw, misses and bluffs the river big
|
Reply With Quote