Hand 1:

Villain 1: 18/10/3.3 over 79 hands
Villain 2: 16/3/1.3 over 74 hands


Villain 1 ($10.40)
MP2 ($10.10)
MP3 ($10)
CO ($9.65)
Hero (Button) ($11.90)
Villain 2 ($10)
BB ($3.65)
UTG ($16.70)
UTG+1 ($10)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 8, 8
2 folds, MP1 bets $0.30, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.30, SB calls $0.25, 1 fold

Flop: ($1) 9, 8, 10 (3 players)
SB checks, MP1 bets $0.60, Hero raises $1.75, SB calls $1.75, 1 fold

Turn: ($5.10) 3 (2 players)
SB bets $2.60, Hero ???

Raised flop bet because its such a drawy board, maybe I could have raised more but I considered both nitty and wanted a call. After he leads the turn it seems like a fold given passiveness.


Hand 2:

Villain is 19/9/inf over 43 hands

SB ($17.45)
Hero (BB) ($11.75)
UTG ($8.90)
UTG+1 ($14.80)
MP1 ($2)
MP2 ($19.05)
MP3 ($15.70)
CO ($10)
Button ($6.10)

Preflop: Hero is BB with Q, A
6 folds, Button bets $0.40, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.30

Flop: ($0.85) 6, Q, 9 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $0.70, Hero calls $0.70

Turn: ($2.25) K (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks

River: ($2.25) 6 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $2, Hero ???

If he had like a 2-4% raise over a larger sample I may consider folding this hand, dunno if other people would. I checked the flop for two reasons: pot control and because calling a raise then leading into him on flop is so strong. I've got no idea what he has after his bet on the river and I don't know what made hand better than mine would take this line so it looks kinda bluffy to me. Didn't make the call though.