well, okay, but we can get away with SUPER unbalanced bet sizing against described villain, and we ought to. villain's prolly calling with Ax, straight draws, 88+, 76 pretty much regardless of sizing. we're getting Ax's stack regardless (unless the board runs out 4-straighted or something, so we make SLIGHTLY more from these hands when we bet bigger); when he has straight draws, we're obviously gonna have greater EV from giving her a higher price on all streets; when he has 76, see Ax; and 88+, he's prolly going to call X amount of streets regardless of sizing, and he'll definitely call the flop regardless of whether we bet .90 or .60. in the same vein, he'll fold stuff that completely missed regardless of sizing, and regardless of how much we bet with the rest of our range, so we can bet .60 with our air and .90 for value.

if i thought villain were very aggressive and was more like to raise a smaller size bet, then i might bet smaller, but i'm actually MORE inclined to consider this the more and more vulnerable our hand is because we wanna be able to b/3b/get it in with 66 on a T76tt board or something.