08-04-2006 02:22 PM
#1
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
08-04-2006 02:26 PM
#2
| |
That could be too rocky or too lose over 1,000 hands. I think you need a bare minimum of 4-5K hands to do an analysis of anything other than that run of cards. | |
08-04-2006 02:39 PM
#3
| |
| |
08-04-2006 03:16 PM
#4
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Ok thanks guys, new to playing ring and using poker tracker, so I'm not too sure what is and what isn't worth looking at yet. |
08-04-2006 04:40 PM
#5
| |
| |
08-04-2006 05:03 PM
#6
| |
My last 1k hands showed a net loss of $10 at 200NL. 10k hands is a better place to start analysis (but nowhere near enough to make broad statements about your game with confidence). | |
| |