|
|
 Originally Posted by jackvance
This is true, but it can be said of most of poker's decisions too. I'm thinking more along the lines of, what if my opponent is unknown? To try to build a statically correct/thought-out strategy. Then deviate from this strategy based on reads, but keep it in as a baseline. I hope that makes sense..
The AK hand, I think it's a fold, looks like he is ahead with a pair, and even if he's bluffing you aren't sure that you'll even get paid off if you hit your 6-outer.
Your opponent won't be unknown for very long, so these decisions won't come up very often. It doesn't take many hands to be able to find something that you can try to exploit.
If you really want to, then just try to make sure teach of your ranges is about equally strong. Trying to get this 100% perfectly balanced isn't really worth it.
|
Reply With Quote