Villain was 53/13/15 (3bet) through 71 hands. Cbet 57%, 4/7.

Had not seen villain play like this at all before this hand.

PokerStars - $0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

UTG: $4.28
MP: $7.58
CO: $8.10
Hero (BTN): $7.01
SB: $11.74
BB: $3.19

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has Q J

fold, fold, CO raises to $0.10, Hero calls $0.10, fold, fold

Flop: ($0.27, 2 players) T 2 2
CO bets $0.05, Hero calls $0.05

Turn: ($0.37, 2 players) Q
CO bets $0.05, Hero raises to $0.30, CO raises to $0.55, Hero calls $0.25

River: ($1.47, 2 players) J
CO bets $0.05, Hero raises to $0.90, CO raises to $1.75, Hero calls $0.85

Interested to see what people are putting villain on. I just could not work out what he was doing.

Was he min betting to induce a raise with his monster?

Why min bet again after 3betting on the turn?

Did he have a marginal hand that he didn't want to fold and thinks that by 3betting me it slows me down on the river so he can get to a cheaper showdown?

Is anybody putting villain on a 2x hand because of the min/r pre because I couldn't.

More likely a Tx hand that may have improved, QT/JT something like that?