|
Renton
|
10-14-2007, 06:24 PM
Post subject: Why play full ring?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Last year, before the gambling enforcement bill, I played on party poker like most of us then. All of the games were very soft and ppl who weren't even very good at poker were pulling insane winrates out. Shorthanded NLHE became really popular and Full Ring NLHE began to dry up.
The adage became "6 max is where its at." This was because of the various benefits of playing six max over full ring at the time:
- higher winrates (example, off the top of my head i think ilikeaces86 was winning 6ptbb/100 lifetime at midstakes six max and 3.5ptbb/100 lifetime at full ring, and was a stellar player at both)
- more hands per hour, people could endlessly multitable six max back in these days and play over 1000 hands per hour. Six max on party was just over 100 hands/hour and full ring was about 60.
- better game selection, there were probably 3 times as many 2/4 and 3/6 shorthanded games running as full ring on party. There were also a lot more fish at six max, because the game played bigger and faster than full ring, making more attuned to a degenerate gambler type.
At the time really the only con to playing six max over full ring was that the variance was a little worse.
Well, times changed and darkness descended. The bill got passed, party poker dropped all americans, and all of a sudden it became much much harder for fish to get money onto the gaming sites. The games got much worse as a result, but some other interesting results emerged.
To understand these interesting results, lets reconsider where the money comes from in Full Ring as opposed to Six Max:
-Full ring is about playing an overall optimal game and beating the field. You isolate fish when you can, and you very often can, but in general you look to make your money from weaktight players, winning a lot of small pots, and relying on the implied odds against these nits to win big pots.
-Six max is more about isolating bad players and taking their money. The structure of the game is optimal for this, as if you sit at a shorthanded table with a huge fish to your right, it becomes very easy to isolate position on him when he limps in, since you are always so close to the button.
So, at a glance, the big reason to play six max was to better isolate fish and play as many pots against them as possible. The winning strategy in full ring is to beat the overall weak tight field and gradual accumulate chips.
So back to the post-bill ramifications. Gradually after the bill was passed, the fish count in all the ponds (six max AND full ring) decreased significantly. The good (relatively) players started to break even and lose to the better players, and as a result they had to study the game and get better. This chain reaction caused EVERYONE but the few fish in the water to get better. Here's the part that most people don't know.
Only the six max regulars got a lot better.
There really has never been much decisive material posted about how to play full ring, whereas SSNL and MSNL on two plus two are constantly churning out content that everyone is reading and taking to heart. CTS makes a blog post about 4bet bluff shoving, all of a sudden the regs are autoshoving Axs to any 3bet for a few weeks. "Range merging" gets mention in a post on MSNL, all of a sudden regs are going for three streets of value with 88 on QJxxx. However, until fairly recently, there hasn't even been a full ring forum anywhere.
So as a summary, the bill:
-lowered the amount of fish
-caused the six max regs to get a lot better, the full ring regs got a little better, but in general were left behind due to lack of published content.
Now lets remember that the fish to reg ratio is was much much higher in six max pre-bill than full ring. This was one of the main reasons of playing it.
So why play full ring now?
Lets begin by debunking all the previous reasons why people played six max pre bill.
- higher winrates - NO ONE is heavily multitabling and beating these games for very high winrates anymore. A datamine from a few months ago of 1/2 six max on stars showed that of all the people that played over 50k hands that month, ONLY ONE was over 3ptbb/100.
- more hands per hour - this goes back to the multitabling issue. The games have become so tough, that one must play a very very exploitive style to win at a good clip. This unfortunately makes it impossible to play more than 4 to 6 tables for all but the elite.
- better game selection - after the bill, the number of fish decreased tremendously, while the number of tough regs, and the toughness of those regs, increased dramatically.
Full ring on the other hand:
- can be beat for a similar rate as six max. There are tons of full ringers who are doing 4+ptbb.
- can be 12 tabled without giving up a whole lot, since the game plays pretty slow and you can play very tight and still be a big winner. (fwiw 12 tabling full ring is roughly equivalent to 8 or 9 tabling six max.
- while there aren't as many fish as six max even still, full ring has almost NO GOOD REGS WHATSOEVER. The winning regs that you will face in full ring, generally speaking, are just really weak and tight, and since they play tightly, they manage to win.
This is the biggest reason to play full ring over six max in my opinion. There are simply very few good exploitive tag regulars. Everyone is just tight, and they win by folding more than everyone else. Obviously this sort of play is very exploitable.
TLDR
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
zook
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,676
|
|
Nice post. I'm moving back to full-ring.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
I would if I could. But i seem to fail miserably at FR. I don't know why.
|
|
|
|
NLHE lahooozaher
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 916
|
|
Very nice post Renton.
You mentioned alot of the reason I moved from 6m to full ring. One of the main reason I moved was because the regs are better at 6m than full ring. I do think, however, that there's alot of content a full ring player can get out of reading shorthanded forums here and at 2p2, full ring players fail to realize this IMO. The reason I say this is because having played 6m for over a year I think that I'm a much better full ring player because of it.
|
|
|
|
donkbee
|
|
WELP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: so close but so far
Posts: 3,604
|
|
I found this post VERY interesting. Thanks for writing it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Why poker fucks with our heads: it's the master that beats you for bringing in the paper, then gives you a milkbone for peeing on the carpet.
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
Nice post. I've been playing a lot more full ring and beating it at about 5ptbb as opposed to 3ptbb at 6-max (100NL). I think the new saying should be "live is where it's at."
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,801
|
|
some thoughts.
Applies even to low stakes. I've played the last few hands 6-max only. The play seems overall stronger than at fullring. I've also found that the bad players bust faster in 6-max, so more luck about who gets their stack.
still some benefits to 6-max though:
*it seems easier to find a big fish-stack
*some sites have next to zero fullring action
*hands/hr affects bonus clearing and rakeback loads
I think 6-max has made me more aggressive and positionally aware in full-ring. Couple this with tighter play pre-flop and I look forward to seeing what happens.
|
|
|
|
bbqsquirrel
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 260
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NLHE lahooozaher
Very nice post Renton.
One of the main reason I moved was because the regs are better at 6m than full ring.
|
Exactly
FR regs are usually stupid nits
In my PT database the people with the most hands usually run @ something like 11/5
They won't donate to you but they won't hurt you either coz they are so predictable
|
|
|
|
Turska
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 254
|
|
I have always preferred FR and PL preferably.
- lowew variance
- higher winrate
- easier to multitask
T.
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
10-16-2007, 06:56 PM
Post subject: Re: Why play full ring?
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
Full ring on the other hand:
[i]
- can be beat for a similar rate as six max. There are tons of full ringers who are doing 4+ptbb.
|
hmmm...I can't remember how long it's been since I sat at a FR table.
First 1K hands @100NL: +15.6 BB/100
Think you might be onto something here, Renton.
|
|
|
|
biondino
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
Posts: 3,170
|
|
Pot limit has been good to me lately for sure.
|
|
|
|
wufwugy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
|
I play fr because i started at fr minbet, understand it better than other forms of poker, suck at sixmax, don't wanna play hu, and seem to finally be figuring out frnl quite well.
Rentpwn, if you haven't already, don't post this on 2p2. I would like to make some easy money for a while.
|
|
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting Mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
|
|
Renton, any chance on getting a few tips for the 6m crowd that may be thinking that you make some interesting points. Can or does anyone have any short answers for a nitty 6m player on what changes he should make when first getting back on a FR table. I for one cannot believe the amount of 15/5 players I am seeing, even on Prima. The aggression is sitting very low on most streets though.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,801
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
Can or does anyone have any short answers for a nitty 6m player on what changes he should make when first getting back on a FR table.
|
If you're nitty (like 16-10 nitty?) in 6-max then play the same game, play the 8 non-blind positions FR the same as the corresponding 4 non-blind positions in 6-max.
|
|
|
|
Da GOAT
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 4,308
|
|
playing 13/10 aint hard. ive always always said 100nl FR is easily beatable
|
|
Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
im soooooo 12 tabling 1/2 fr on stars at the weekend for 12hours
for renton i think.
|
|
|
|
wufwugy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
|
What? Why?
Way bad move to not play on US-restricted sites when able.
|
|
|
|
XTR1000
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2006
Location: surfing in a room
Posts: 2,188
|
|
nice post, cant disagree.
btw, if 16/10 is considered "nitty" at fr, what do we call the crowd of 9/4 regs?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred
xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
|
yo
|
|
Ltrain
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
|
|
Saw a lot of you last night...DW Duck remembered the handshake
|
|
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
|
|
NLHE lahooozaher
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 916
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XTR1000
btw, if 16/10 is considered "nitty" at fr, what do we call the crowd of 9/4 regs?
|
I play around 15/10 and when I see people with stats of <10vpip and <5pfr I just call them terrible and pound the shit out of their blinds and limps.
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NLHE lahooozaher
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XTR1000
btw, if 16/10 is considered "nitty" at fr, what do we call the crowd of 9/4 regs?
|
I play around 15/10 and when I see people with stats of <10vpip and <5pfr I just call them terrible and pound the shit out of their blinds and limps.
|
only ~2k hands so far and I'm running 16/6/3...12.4BB/100...
obv. not raising enough. we'll see where I go when I get more comfortable
|
|
|
|
wufwugy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
|
DO YOU REALIZE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE RENTON
|
|
|
|
|~|ypermegachi
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: emo-kid
Posts: 3,580
|
|
this post has exciting implications...
|
|
|
|
Chopper
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 4,255
|
|
i had switched back awhile ago, but didnt realize why. now i think i had it explained to me. thx.
btw, i had to go back to limit for awhile to stop the spewtard in me from 6max...lol.
you want fish that go busto slower than prostate piss, play some limit...if you can handle the boredom of the ubergrind.
rent, great insight. i am glad i have a mind like yours to explain it all to a mind like mine. makes things easier...lol.
|
|
LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.
Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
|
|
allabout
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: VA USA
Posts: 276
|
|
Renton (or anyone else), I know this is pretty old, just wondering if you still feel this way? Been thinking about going to 6-max lately.
|
|
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." - Elmer Letterman
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
still somewhat true, but the games have gotten significantly worse all around
|
|
|
|
Ltrain
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 514
|
|
I rotate back and forth between FR and SH on Stars depending upon the time of day and table selection at 100NL and 200NL. IMO, FR is easier for opening a lot of tables, generating VPP's and playing in automode. However, I find SH players stack off with TP more frequently than the tighter regs at FR and the shorties are about as easy to clean up. You do need to be more careful at SH though because I find it has a lot more 100bb+ deep stacked play vs. FR.
|
|
"Don't judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes. Then you are a mile away, and have his shoes." - Anon.
|
|
Gobbatino
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 341
|
|
Well it's been roughly a year since someone posted an update to this and I just bumped into this post. I was wondering if people who have experience on both FR and SH in recent times have any insights/updates on how they compare now?
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
FR soft coz i can beat it
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
I'm going to pick a random three 3/6 tables on Stars this fine Wednesday afternoon:
Table 1
seat 1: full stack donk
seat 2: very good reg
seat 3: meh reg
seat 4: good reg
seat 5: ok reg
seat 6: good reg
seat 7: bad reg
seat 8: ok reg
seat 9: terrible reg
Table 2
seat 1: fullstack donk
seat 2: ok reg
seat 3: bad reg
seat 4: unknown
seat 5: good reg
seat 6: very good reg
seat 7: meh reg
seat 8: terrible reg
seat 9: ok reg
Table 3
seat 1: full stack donk
seat 2: ok reg
seat 3: very good reg
seat 4: halfstack donk
seat 5: very good reg
seat 6: meh reg
seat 7: good reg
seat 8: ok reg
seat 9: good reg
This is at 3/6, the 2nd highest limit that normally runs for full ring. I can't imagine how much better the .5/1 or 1/2 games are. We are in good times guys; get out there and make some money.
|
|
|
|
bikes
|
|
a hot damn mess
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,447
|
|
Holla!
|
|
I damage threads that may actually benefit some posters
|
|
BankItDrew
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
Dean, any guesses as to why?
I'm thinking summer (students)
|

Girlfriend: Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!
Girlfriend: Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?
Girlfriend: Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
|
|
bikes
|
|
a hot damn mess
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,447
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BankItDrew
Dean, any guesses as to why?
I'm thinking summer (students)
|
or the short handed games have gotten considerably better in comparison
|
|
I damage threads that may actually benefit some posters
|
|
NLHE lahooozaher
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 916
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Deanglow
This is at 3/6, the 2nd highest limit that normally runs for full ring. I can't imagine how much better the .5/1 or 1/2 games are. We are in good times guys; get out there and make some money.
|
Most 1/2 tables are 8 regs and one fish. .5/1 is insanely easier than 1/2 but I play 1/2 to get my fix of vpps
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
In general summers are usually better than the rest of the year but I can't imagine 1/2 being 8 regs and one fish. Because most regs are pretty much fish.
|
|
|
|
Projectp
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 79
|
|
So dean, was that you in seat 1 of those 3 tables?
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
Any update on this?
|
|
|
|
Fedora
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 91
|
|
bump, can anyone that plays both currently comment please?
|
|
|
|
Micro2Macro
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: http://three-pair.com/
Posts: 4,460
|
|
I play both. It's all poker to me is all I can say.
|
"Once we reach a certain level of mastery, we see there are higher levels and challenges. If we are disciplined and patient, we proceed. At each higher level, new pleasures and insights await us--ones not even suspected when we started out. We can take this as far as we want--in any human activity there is always a higher level to which we can aspire."
Check out my blog here!
"You are a degenerate Gaam-balur"
http://www.philgalfond.com/lets-make-some-changes/
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
its all the same now
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,801
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanglow
I'm going to pick a random three 3/6 tables on Stars this fine Wednesday afternoon:
Table 1
seat 1: full stack donk
seat 2: very good reg
seat 3: meh reg
seat 4: good reg
seat 5: ok reg
seat 6: good reg
seat 7: bad reg
seat 8: ok reg
seat 9: terrible reg
Table 2
seat 1: fullstack donk
seat 2: ok reg
seat 3: bad reg
seat 4: unknown
seat 5: good reg
seat 6: very good reg
seat 7: meh reg
seat 8: terrible reg
seat 9: ok reg
Table 3
seat 1: full stack donk
seat 2: ok reg
seat 3: very good reg
seat 4: halfstack donk
seat 5: very good reg
seat 6: meh reg
seat 7: good reg
seat 8: ok reg
seat 9: good reg
This is at 3/6, the 2nd highest limit that normally runs for full ring. I can't imagine how much better the .5/1 or 1/2 games are. We are in good times guys; get out there and make some money.
|
how do the games compare now (post april 15)?
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
You'll be lucky to have 1 fish at your 3/6 table.
|
|
|
|
allena
|
|
High Card
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
|
|
Wao .. Very nice thread infact its better if call it an article.
|
|
|