|
Originally Posted by Numbr2intheWorld
You're right actually, my mistake, this graph is basically bullshit just because the Onion is such a sensitive crop. This is a more relevant one.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Reading the article you posted, it doesn't really make sense. If you look at the price of onions during this time you can see the price is actually fluctuating about the same when there was a futures market for Onions. Where is this abnormal dip that clearly shows manipulation?
The funny thing is the same thing is happening in India right now, except this time blaming a spike in prices on traders. LOL.
Sorry, I should have found a better article than that, but I thought it was cool that Time has all those old articles archived on-line.
I would guess the graph doesn't show the dramatic price depreciation due to how often the points of the graph are plotted. If they made the graph on this scale and plotted daily price fluctuations it would be near unreadable. That said, The annual first quarter price spikes do not occur during the time in question (about 48-24 months before the act is passed).
Anyway, that was just a throwaway anecdote that was stuck in my head for some reason. I don't see any reason that onions should be barred from futures trading while other produce, like potatoes, are allowed. The ban was probably just a reactionary political move to please affected constituents, but I would have to read far more about the incident than I care to in order to find out.
Farmers are much worse speculators than professionals and have less of an idea of what the true value of an onion is at a specific time.
I agree with this point, and the ideas behind the rest of your post for that matter. However, does this same statement work for the relationship between oil suppliers/refiners/companies and oil speculators as well as it does for onion farmers?
|