Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumAll Other Poker/Live Poker

Table limits vs. Players' skills

Results 1 to 32 of 32
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA

    Default Table limits vs. Players' skills

    I had a pretty good session (i.e. profitable) at Commerce Casino on Saturday. I was sitting at a 2-4 limit table and as expected, three or four players on the table were really poor. They were the definition of no fold'em hold'em. At what table minimums do players start to get better?

    BTW, I love the big chicks!!! Won the pot with that three or four times!
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA

    Default Table limits vs. Players' skills

    I had a pretty good session (i.e. profitable) at Commerce Casino on Saturday. I was sitting at a 2-4 limit table and as expected, three or four players on the table were really poor. They were the definition of no fold'em hold'em. At what table minimums do players start to get better?

    BTW, I love the big chicks!!! Won the pot with that three or four times!
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA

    Default Table limits vs. Players' skills

    I had a pretty good session (i.e. profitable) at Commerce Casino on Saturday. I was sitting at a 2-4 limit table and as expected, three or four players on the table were really poor. They were the definition of no fold'em hold'em. At what table minimums do players start to get better?

    BTW, I love the big chicks!!! Won the pot with that three or four times!
  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA

    Default Table limits vs. Players' skills

    I had a pretty good session (i.e. profitable) at Commerce Casino on Saturday. I was sitting at a 2-4 limit table and as expected, three or four players on the table were really poor. They were the definition of no fold'em hold'em. At what table minimums do players start to get better?

    BTW, I love the big chicks!!! Won the pot with that three or four times!
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA

    Default Table limits vs. Players' skills

    I had a pretty good session (i.e. profitable) at Commerce Casino on Saturday. I was sitting at a 2-4 limit table and as expected, three or four players on the table were really poor. They were the definition of no fold'em hold'em. At what table minimums do players start to get better?

    BTW, I love the big chicks!!! Won the pot with that three or four times!
  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA

    Default Table limits vs. Players' skills

    I had a pretty good session (i.e. profitable) at Commerce Casino on Saturday. I was sitting at a 2-4 limit table and as expected, three or four players on the table were really poor. They were the definition of no fold'em hold'em. At what table minimums do players start to get better?

    BTW, I love the big chicks!!! Won the pot with that three or four times!
  7. #7
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I've played 3-6 at Hollywood Park and 4-8 in Vegas. In both cases the players still seem to be very poor. I'm not sure when they start getting better.
  8. #8
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I've played 3-6 at Hollywood Park and 4-8 in Vegas. In both cases the players still seem to be very poor. I'm not sure when they start getting better.
  9. #9
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I've played 3-6 at Hollywood Park and 4-8 in Vegas. In both cases the players still seem to be very poor. I'm not sure when they start getting better.
  10. #10
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I've played 3-6 at Hollywood Park and 4-8 in Vegas. In both cases the players still seem to be very poor. I'm not sure when they start getting better.
  11. #11
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I've played 3-6 at Hollywood Park and 4-8 in Vegas. In both cases the players still seem to be very poor. I'm not sure when they start getting better.
  12. #12
    Eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,458
    Location
    California, USA
    I've played 3-6 at Hollywood Park and 4-8 in Vegas. In both cases the players still seem to be very poor. I'm not sure when they start getting better.
  13. #13
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    Yes. Commerce Casino was profitable indeed. I love sitting next to people who don't know how to protect their cards. This guy was practically showing everyone sitting up to two seats from him at least one of his cards every hand.

    One time I was heads-up with him with a flush draw on the board. I had AA, no flush, but I knew he didn't have the flush because I saw his card before the flop. Of course, I bet all the way and won the pot.
  14. #14
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    Yes. Commerce Casino was profitable indeed. I love sitting next to people who don't know how to protect their cards. This guy was practically showing everyone sitting up to two seats from him at least one of his cards every hand.

    One time I was heads-up with him with a flush draw on the board. I had AA, no flush, but I knew he didn't have the flush because I saw his card before the flop. Of course, I bet all the way and won the pot.
  15. #15
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    Yes. Commerce Casino was profitable indeed. I love sitting next to people who don't know how to protect their cards. This guy was practically showing everyone sitting up to two seats from him at least one of his cards every hand.

    One time I was heads-up with him with a flush draw on the board. I had AA, no flush, but I knew he didn't have the flush because I saw his card before the flop. Of course, I bet all the way and won the pot.
  16. #16
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    Yes. Commerce Casino was profitable indeed. I love sitting next to people who don't know how to protect their cards. This guy was practically showing everyone sitting up to two seats from him at least one of his cards every hand.

    One time I was heads-up with him with a flush draw on the board. I had AA, no flush, but I knew he didn't have the flush because I saw his card before the flop. Of course, I bet all the way and won the pot.
  17. #17
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    Yes. Commerce Casino was profitable indeed. I love sitting next to people who don't know how to protect their cards. This guy was practically showing everyone sitting up to two seats from him at least one of his cards every hand.

    One time I was heads-up with him with a flush draw on the board. I had AA, no flush, but I knew he didn't have the flush because I saw his card before the flop. Of course, I bet all the way and won the pot.
  18. #18
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery
    Yes. Commerce Casino was profitable indeed. I love sitting next to people who don't know how to protect their cards. This guy was practically showing everyone sitting up to two seats from him at least one of his cards every hand.

    One time I was heads-up with him with a flush draw on the board. I had AA, no flush, but I knew he didn't have the flush because I saw his card before the flop. Of course, I bet all the way and won the pot.
  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Yeah, I especially like the guy sitting to my right that would count on his fingers to see if he could make an inside straight, while showing me one of his hole cards. I can't wait to play Hollywood Park this weekend.
  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Yeah, I especially like the guy sitting to my right that would count on his fingers to see if he could make an inside straight, while showing me one of his hole cards. I can't wait to play Hollywood Park this weekend.
  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Yeah, I especially like the guy sitting to my right that would count on his fingers to see if he could make an inside straight, while showing me one of his hole cards. I can't wait to play Hollywood Park this weekend.
  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Yeah, I especially like the guy sitting to my right that would count on his fingers to see if he could make an inside straight, while showing me one of his hole cards. I can't wait to play Hollywood Park this weekend.
  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Yeah, I especially like the guy sitting to my right that would count on his fingers to see if he could make an inside straight, while showing me one of his hole cards. I can't wait to play Hollywood Park this weekend.
  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    68
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Yeah, I especially like the guy sitting to my right that would count on his fingers to see if he could make an inside straight, while showing me one of his hole cards. I can't wait to play Hollywood Park this weekend.
  25. #25
    omg, those posts are hilarious!!!

    yeah, basically everyone everywhere sucks at those stakes. It's too bad the rake at Commerce is so damn high.

    I've played Commerce, Bicycle, Hollywood Park, Monte Carlo, Bellagio, Palms, and almost all of the players at stakes 2-4 up to 4-8 were the same - suck ass.

    The players are a bit worse than online, but online has a lower rake, so both games are profitable.
  26. #26
    omg, those posts are hilarious!!!

    yeah, basically everyone everywhere sucks at those stakes. It's too bad the rake at Commerce is so damn high.

    I've played Commerce, Bicycle, Hollywood Park, Monte Carlo, Bellagio, Palms, and almost all of the players at stakes 2-4 up to 4-8 were the same - suck ass.

    The players are a bit worse than online, but online has a lower rake, so both games are profitable.
  27. #27
    omg, those posts are hilarious!!!

    yeah, basically everyone everywhere sucks at those stakes. It's too bad the rake at Commerce is so damn high.

    I've played Commerce, Bicycle, Hollywood Park, Monte Carlo, Bellagio, Palms, and almost all of the players at stakes 2-4 up to 4-8 were the same - suck ass.

    The players are a bit worse than online, but online has a lower rake, so both games are profitable.
  28. #28
    omg, those posts are hilarious!!!

    yeah, basically everyone everywhere sucks at those stakes. It's too bad the rake at Commerce is so damn high.

    I've played Commerce, Bicycle, Hollywood Park, Monte Carlo, Bellagio, Palms, and almost all of the players at stakes 2-4 up to 4-8 were the same - suck ass.

    The players are a bit worse than online, but online has a lower rake, so both games are profitable.
  29. #29
    omg, those posts are hilarious!!!

    yeah, basically everyone everywhere sucks at those stakes. It's too bad the rake at Commerce is so damn high.

    I've played Commerce, Bicycle, Hollywood Park, Monte Carlo, Bellagio, Palms, and almost all of the players at stakes 2-4 up to 4-8 were the same - suck ass.

    The players are a bit worse than online, but online has a lower rake, so both games are profitable.
  30. #30
    omg, those posts are hilarious!!!

    yeah, basically everyone everywhere sucks at those stakes. It's too bad the rake at Commerce is so damn high.

    I've played Commerce, Bicycle, Hollywood Park, Monte Carlo, Bellagio, Palms, and almost all of the players at stakes 2-4 up to 4-8 were the same - suck ass.

    The players are a bit worse than online, but online has a lower rake, so both games are profitable.
  31. #31

    Default good players at any limit

    it's been my experience that there can be good players at any limit. often times players who are good at lower limit games are too timid in the bigger games and bigger limit players are too loose in the smaller limit games.
  32. #32
    pokerfanatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,793
    Location
    6max limit tables
    I hear that even at 5-10 and sometimes 10-20 you get players that don't know what they are doing, sometimes you get the rare fish at the 30-60 table that everyone eats as if they are parasite or something, my rule a thumb, the higher the stacks the more people play bettor (unless they just have money to burn and are high rollers or something). I have heard that it starts tightening up once you hit about 10-20 or 20-40 I do believe. With no limit I’m not sure that's a completely different story.
    “Dream as if you’ll live forever. Live as if you’ll die today.” ~ James Dean ~

    "Poker is a lot like sex, peoples perceived ability usually blinds the truth" ~ me ~

    "God bless him. Got to bet big to win big! GAMB00L!!!" ~ Fnord

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •