Originally Posted by
dhubermex
To Luco,
No worries on the harshness. I think your point is valid and I'm glad you're picking up on it. The truth is that I've been "following along" with the thread rather than meticulously going back and analyzing what has been said and comparing the timing. There are definite disadvantages to this and anyone is more than welcome (even entitled to imo) call out players who are not as thorough. I don't take it personally regardless of how roles shake out, and the reason why I haven't gone over everything with a fine-tooth comb is mainly work-related.
With that said, another reason is that I feel there are certain disadvantages to over-analysis. I discovered this when modding the Gold Rush match and also felt this was a minor hindrance during the most recent anon-match. Again, in my opinion, there were clear-cut wolves "aroooing" in both matches there were overlooked due to over-thinking things by certain villagers. Of course my sample size is extremely small and I could be mistaken... we'll just have to see how this ends.
I have provided reasons why I believe Ong/Keybored/Luco are best wolf candidates at this time. If it ultimately turns out that the fine-tooth comb method outs wolves, then that's great, but this is two-games in a row where I've felt there are obvious indicators in which my role should have been mass-distinguished as a villager, yet there are several suspicious players still placing me in potential wolf category (more players than possible wolves as a matter of fact).
So my own thoughts remain...
Likely Village: me, MMM, BID, JKDS, Hoopy
Likely Wolves: Ong, Keybored, Luco
When a new post comes up accusing someone of being a particular role, I do go back and look at it to see if the argument fits with my line of thinking. Despite that, I remain unconvinced even after Ong's newfound clarity after I rescinded penultimate lynch-vote to make sure he wasn't lynched without the opportunity to make more of a case). However, I think it is fair for villagers working on roles to be aware that Luco's assumptions on my participation (although a bit "harsh") are geniune, and also be aware of how I'm drawing my conclusions.