women turn into hos when they are ovulating

Thought this was pretty neat.

Quote:

---

3. Women Are More Likely to Cheat When Ovulating

Along similar lines, we could expect that women are more likely to cheat when they are ovulating. Science confirms:

“We found that women were most attracted to men other than their primary partner when they were in the high fertility phase of the menstrual cycle,” said Dr. Martie Haselton, a UCLA researcher. “That’s the day of ovulation and several days beforehand.” –(Source)

Put another way:

Women who are in relationships exhibit the most extreme spike in interest for masculine men around ovulation. The shift is even more exaggerated when they’re not happy with their current partners, said Kristina Durante, a social psychologist at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. –(Source)

---

From: http://www.thesuperredneck.com/seven...out-ovulation/

Epic bait.

also best website name ever. the super redneck

It also depends on how attractive their male cousins are

There's been a ton of research into this subject, which all comes to the same conclusion. I'd be interested in a study that looks into the behaviour of men however when their balls are at their fullest e.g. are they more likely to go with a fatty?

Personally I'd rather have a wank than nail someone I don't fancy. Doesn't matter how long it's been since I last got laid. Sex is great when it's with someone you actually have feelings for, but lacking in love it's basically a glory wank that you have to talk to. At least with porn you can turn it off and play poker after spaffing, without a shred of guilt.

Lol ong you must be doing it wrong.

I'm with ong, emotions are the greatest aphrodisiac.

i have heard that most women are more likely to reach orgasm when they feel in love with their partner, or strong emotions of that nature. then again, it's generally easier for men to reach orgasm, so that's probably why you can achieve it even if it's just a "glory wank" (lolol), but yeah, the overall quality of the exp is definitely better when you love (or are on the path to it) someone.

also, i'm sure some sources in that post are legit (funny how a lot of them lead to dead pages though) but when a page posts trash like this: http://www.thesuperredneck.com/how-t...-alpha-female/ it might be cooler to just cite from the source itself. :)

I just don't really enjoy casual sex. I mean I do at the time, but then I start to think this would be much nicer if I actually liked you as a person, then start feeling guilty for feeling like that. idk, I guess my problem is I last had casual sex with a girl who wanted to move to fucking Cornwall with me. I'd just broken up with someone I loved and was going to Cornwall to sort my head out, I didn't want her coming along. With her kid. jfc. Makes me feel guilty, women are rarely up for just a shag, even if they suggest they are. And I'm not sure I'm up for just a shag anymore either. More hassle than it's worth.

Fake name, don't let them know where you live, ez game

right. i'm sure there are instances where the immediate attraction is so powerful and feral that a one-night stand in that case might be incredibly satisfying in its own right (wish i could speak from experience on that lol, but alas i can't), but overall, emotions are what keep something worthwhile and satisfying as a long-term thing. this is definitely not true for everyone - some people just love sex and that's totally cool - but i think it is true for the average person.

wtf is a glory fap

glory due to the fact that you are not using your hand foo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OngBonga

I'd just broken up with someone I loved and was going to Cornwall to sort my head out, I didn't want her coming along. With her kid. jfc.

---

is that a shameless brag about how fertile your sperm are......and if so avoid it by using a condom

im just happy you spelled ho right. slang for whore is not a gardening tool

thread so gay I just ovulated all over ong's face.

i think that makes the thread some sort of trans

thread so trans I just jerked off wuggy's oversized clit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by d0zer

thread so gay I just ovulated all over ong's face.

---

This gives me the horn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aubreymcfate

glory due to the fact that you are not using your hand foo

---

TIL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OngBonga

Personally I'd rather have a wank than nail someone I don't fancy. Doesn't matter how long it's been since I last got laid. Sex is great when it's with someone you actually have feelings for, but lacking in love it's basically a glory wank that you have to talk to. At least with porn you can turn it off and play poker after spaffing, without a shred of guilt.

---

Quote:

---

I don't pay for sex, I pay them to leave

---

...

Is that second quote even a quote of mine?

Just words of wisdom.

They are indeed wise words. Not mine though. Sounds like spoon.

This thread compelled me to laughter. Okay back to lurking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wufwugy

im just happy you spelled ho right. slang for whore is not a gardening tool

---

wrong

gardening tool: hoe/hoes/hoeing/hoed
woman: ho/hoes/hoing/hoed

all of hos, hoes, and ho's are technically correct, but hoes is the least sensible

Hos is pronounced "hoss" while hoes is pronounced "hoes". Now which one do you think is better?

Let's say you're the first person to do this, and what you want to do is say "when I see my homey, I give him my yo". But you want to pluralize it, so you say "when I see my homies/eys, I give them my yo's". Which looks okay, the apostrophe for pluralizing weird/new words is acceptable. But maybe you think the apostrophe is confusing, so your next step is just an irregular spelling, resulting in "yos". You're okay with this because it's English, where irregular is the name of the game. But then some pencil pusher changes it to "yoes" and you think he just misspelled yes.

Buncha hoes in the shed

-es is the proper nomenclature for pluralizing words ending with o. See tornado/tornadoes, volcano/volcanoes, domino/dominoes. It's also the proper nomenclature for the present tense of verbs ending with o, like go/goes, or veto/vetoes. So whether its a group of hoes or a woman who hoes, its spelled with -es bro.

slang be different, yo. Especially when abbreviated.

Let's say you want to abbreviate tornadoes just like ho from whore, so you call a tornado a "to". Then you pluralize it and shout "hide yourself, dem to's be rockin' the roof!". "Toes" is the last form the "to" shortened form of "tornadoes" would take

I realize you two are just trying to upset me at this point.

http://i.minus.com/iqxfDJHBfS8MI.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wufwugy

slang be different, yo. Especially when abbreviated.

Let's say you want to abbreviate tornadoes just like ho from whore, so you call a tornado a "to". Then you pluralize it and shout "hide yourself, dem to's be rockin' the roof!". "Toes" is the last form the "to" shortened form of "tornadoes" would take

---

Ho is not short for hornado though. It's short for whore. Your hypothetical is thus irrelevant but I'll allow it. If slang for tornado was "to" it is hard to know how we would spell its plural, but there's a difference between toes and hoes. The gardening instrument is a lot less likely to be confused than the body part in a 2014 conversation, unless you're having that conversation in rural Idaho or something. Using the apostrophe is just graceless, and akin to spelling you're your or something. Extremely annoying. Out of the three bandied about spellings of hoes, hos, and ho's, ho's is certainly the least sensible and least aesthetically pleasing.

I agree that the apostrophe is graceless

Two things I've learned about English by taking clases de espanol: (1) English ultimately cares little about form, and instead cares about practicality. This is why we use a crazy amount of idioms, abbreviations, incorporations from other languages, and the like. (2) Caused by this, English has way too many words with many meanings. Not only does the language not make much sense or follow much of any real rules, the confusion is expounded by new definition creation of words that already exist. This is one reason why I think it's better to create a new word in "hos" than to incorporate it into "hoes". The "-es" rule isn't that much of a rule in the first place (English hates rules), and using "hos" can help eliminate that confusion. The pronunciation is an issue, but I think it's less of one than laying multiple definitions on top of specific spellings.

However, there is argument that the apostrophe is correct since slicin' off letters from a word is supposed to replace them with an apostrophe, but that habit seems to have all but disappeared

Yeah I don't like the apostrophe as contraction theory, because in that case you'd have to add another apostrophe at the beginning (the w is omitted along with the re) and it would be 'ho's which just looks stupid.

the article pretty much states the obvious sloots will be sloots just tag em and bag em and move on

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Bigcity

the article pretty much states the obvious sloots will be sloots just tag em and bag em and move on

---

Do you think MMF threesomes are gay? Just curious.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spoonitnow

Do you think MMF threesomes are gay? Just curious.

---

As opposed to MFM?

Because yes.

Let's say you have a grandpa and abbreviate his name to pa then you have another grandpa and now you have to pas. Two pa's? Two paws?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BennyLaRue

As opposed to MFM?

Because yes.

---

Well played.

Sorry spoon.

The ladies got together to create their own peer reviewed scientific periodical called 'Emotion Review' and they say you're wrong.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor..._on_their.html

I wish I were clever enough to make a better joke about the journal being called Emotion Review.

The researchers suspect that the drive to chart women’s choices on their fertility calendars reflects our desire to understand human behavior via rudimentary evolutionary explanations: “More modern evolutionary approaches,” they write, “recognize that social learning and innovation are central human adaptations that are enabled by biological processes” and that ”the evolution of the human brain did not stop with these ancient sensory, perceptual, and motivational systems.”

PS yah burnt

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spoonitnow

Well played.

---

Yeah, you have to be very clear on the difference between MMF and MFM or thing goan get awkward (and maybe bloody! from the bum!).

to which the caller shouted.

ITS SMEE AGAIN GOAN FUCK YOURSELF

*slow claps*

I found this interesting article on the internets and thought that spoonitnow might be interested in it, since he is so passionate about gender issues in these increasingly complicated modern times.

http://www.xojane.com/issues/feminis...ractical-steps

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by d0zer

since he is so passionate about gender issues in these increasingly complicated modern times.

---

http://media3.giphy.com/media/w8u0sCSQwFd4s/giphy.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by d0zer

I found this interesting article on the internets and thought that spoonitnow might be interested in it, since he is so passionate about gender issues in these increasingly complicated modern times.

http://www.xojane.com/issues/feminis...ractical-steps

---

Yeah I saw that the other day. It's ridiculously and hilariously awful.