|
[NL10] River setsize ok?
Villian: Hands: 25 VPIP: 8 PFR: 0
PokerStars - $0.10 NL - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3
UTG: $10.00
UTG+1: $14.93
MP: $10.16
MP+1: $21.34
LP: $7.30
CO: $9.50
BTN: $19.43
Hero (SB): $10.00
BB: $19.67
Hero posts SB $0.05, BB posts BB $0.10
Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero has 5 9
fold, fold, fold, MP+1 calls $0.10, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls $0.05, BB checks
Flop: ($0.30, 3 players) 9 2 9
Hero checks, BB checks, MP+1 bets $0.29, Hero calls $0.29, fold
Turn: ($0.88, 2 players) 6
Hero checks, MP+1 checks
River: ($0.88, 2 players) 9
Hero bets $0.84, MP+1 calls $0.84
Hero shows 5 9 (Four of a Kind, Nines) (Pre 34%, Flop 99%, Turn 100%)
MP+1 mucks J A (Three of a Kind, Nines) (Pre 66%, Flop 1%, Turn 0%)
Hero wins $2.44
After I played this hand I started to wonder if I should have bet more on the River. On the Flop I put him on some kind of A2s hand, or a low pair 88-, and villian just wanted to get the pot decided there and now fearing someone hitting one of their overcards. I guess on this level a lot of players just call PF with hands like that, also based on this PFR stat. When he stopped betting after the Turn card, I still had him on A2s or a pair lower than the 6 that came on the Turn. So with that read, should I have bet more than potsize on River. Would he have called a bigger bet sitting with A2, 55, 44, or 33?
I know a bigger bet would not have worked, but I did not have any hands like AJ in his range. Should I have put him on a hand like that? I mean someone, who isn't raising a hand like that PF, would he bet full pot on that flop?
This hand is probably a normal hand for you guys, but it confuses me LOL
I got lucky, as it seems that my betsize on the River, looked a bit bluffy to villain
|