04-20-2017 10:36 AM
#151
| |
04-20-2017 10:57 AM
#152
| |
|
False |
04-20-2017 11:55 AM
#153
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 12:58 PM
#154
| |
04-20-2017 01:45 PM
#155
| |
|
Agree |
04-20-2017 02:37 PM
#156
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 02:44 PM
#157
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 03:01 PM
#158
| |
|
OMFG you've been so duped!! |
Last edited by BananaStand; 04-20-2017 at 03:04 PM. | |
04-20-2017 03:20 PM
#159
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 03:34 PM
#160
| |
|
Comin again to save the mutha fuckin day yeah! |
04-20-2017 03:39 PM
#161
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 03:46 PM
#162
| |
|
Well you should |
04-20-2017 04:04 PM
#163
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 04:05 PM
#164
| |
| |
| |
04-20-2017 04:13 PM
#165
| |
04-21-2017 09:25 AM
#166
| |
Meh, gloating aside, I see the Bill O'Reilly firing as a victory for the constant struggle of women in the workplace. I've seen it so often and I'm happy for such a high exposure outcome. I've seen the boys club mentality at almost every level of every company I've consulted for with my former company and I saw it among the ranks of the leadership within said former company. I've watched former bosses refer to women as too emotional, on her period, the one with the boobs, etc etc and I'm tired of it. There's a clear lack of respect for women (often not always overt) and so many choose to look the other way or pretend it doesn't exist and is some liberal agenda conspiracy. | |
| |
04-21-2017 09:30 AM
#167
| |
Here's a cat with a mustache | |
| |
04-21-2017 12:09 PM
#168
| |
| |
04-21-2017 01:37 PM
#169
| |
|
No one is suggesting that doesn't happen, or that it doesn't exist, or that it's all some liberal conspiracy. |
04-21-2017 01:53 PM
#170
| |
Women do indeed have tits and periods. Perhaps as we stive for equality, we should ban these things. Also ban dicks, facial hair, anything that differentiates males from females. | |
| |
04-21-2017 02:58 PM
#171
| |
| |
| |
04-22-2017 09:39 AM
#172
| |
Idk if Bill's accusers are legit or not. But there are a ton of ppl who'd throw away a career for a million bucks. | |
04-22-2017 10:01 AM
#173
| |
I'd guess that for most people, if they had a million bucks, then they'd no longer need a career. | |
04-22-2017 06:03 PM
#174
| |
A few questions/comments: | |
| |
04-23-2017 11:33 AM
#175
| |
I think you're conflating the preposterous idea that "people should be exactly the same" with my idea of trying to support marginalized groups. I'm not stating the former so I'm not sure your above statement applies. I'd be happy to have an argument on why the human race has evolved past this faux-Darwinism 'enlightenment' but unless you can convince me, I don't think your post applies except as maybe an apathetic excuse to ignore the marginalized. | |
| |
04-23-2017 03:35 PM
#176
| |
The problem I have with this matter is that anyone can put themself into a "marginalised group" if they really want to be a victim. | |
| |
04-23-2017 03:43 PM
#177
| |
The thing about weakness... in places like Saudi Arabi, it's their physical weakness that puts them at a disadvantage. That's men forcing their physical dominance over women. That is a problem for me. Here, in the UK, and the USA, physical weakness is not a barrier to success. | |
| |
04-24-2017 11:27 AM
#178
| |
|
Well, you go on to say that you don't disagree with my middle two paragraphs. So in essence, you're admitting that both men and women do shitty things to each other for a myriad of reasons. If you're only going to be laser-focused on instances of men putting down women, then you're choosing to embrace only the evidence that supports your opinion, and ignoring everything else. That's bias. |
04-24-2017 12:01 PM
#179
| |
|
Pretty harsh, but not totally inaccurate. |
04-24-2017 02:06 PM
#180
| |
| |
| |
04-24-2017 02:32 PM
#181
| |
|
I think you're trying to make a different point but you happened to have touched on something pretty important. |
Last edited by BananaStand; 04-24-2017 at 02:37 PM. | |
04-24-2017 03:31 PM
#182
| |
| |
| |
04-24-2017 04:41 PM
#183
| |
I think you firmly believe that Donald Trump and his Goldman Sachs cabinet members is the best thing to have happened to poor people, right after sliced bread | |
| |
04-24-2017 04:47 PM
#184
| |
| |
04-24-2017 05:09 PM
#185
| |
Empathy is a good thing from a strategic point of view. If you can understand a person's emotions, why someone feels the way they do, you're better placed to take advantage of their weakness. | |
| |
04-24-2017 05:12 PM
#186
| |
| |
04-24-2017 05:21 PM
#187
| |
While I agree that most people are confusing and do things which are contrary to their self-interest, there are other people. | |
04-24-2017 05:55 PM
#188
| |
| |
04-24-2017 07:20 PM
#189
| |
|
The is the failed logic of the left. The answer to poverty is opportunity, not empathy. |
04-24-2017 08:12 PM
#190
| |
|
The groups of people that exist are unimportant in this argument it's about the approach which pays the most dividends. So not that the group doesn't exist but like why isn't it bigger, performing better, etc. |
04-24-2017 08:15 PM
#191
| |
|
For a start the sweeping statement of survivorship bias aside is great, figure that one out and you'll make a few pennies. I disagree with the statement as a whole too really (nor the antithesis) & don't really see any reason why it should be true bar that person made money therefore they understand making money which is such a general nonsense statement that it is meaningless. |
04-25-2017 09:26 AM
#192
| |
|
This reads like it was written when you were drunk |
04-25-2017 09:53 AM
#193
| |
| |
Last edited by Savy; 04-25-2017 at 11:30 AM. | |
04-25-2017 03:49 PM
#194
| |
| |
04-25-2017 03:55 PM
#195
| |
| |
04-25-2017 04:07 PM
#196
| |
I always assumed it came from Mongoloid, and where I'm from, that's a slang term for Downs' Syndrome given the slant of their eyes. So I would say it's more anti-disabled than anti-Mongolian, though its' not a flattering comparison for the latter either. Don't see where the racism comes in since Mongols aren't a race. | |
04-25-2017 04:31 PM
#197
| |
| |
04-25-2017 06:23 PM
#198
| |
I approve of the word mong. | |
| |
04-25-2017 06:23 PM
#199
| |
Also, spaz. | |
| |
04-26-2017 08:47 AM
#200
| |
Mongol is the adjective form of Mongolia. | |
Last edited by MadMojoMonkey; 04-26-2017 at 08:50 AM. | |
04-26-2017 10:43 AM
#201
| |
It doesn't even matter about race. Savy wasn't saying "mong" as in someone from Mongolia, that's not really much of an insult. He was saying "mong" as in someone with down's syndrome. | |
| |
04-26-2017 10:53 AM
#202
| |
| |
04-26-2017 11:03 AM
#203
| |
| |
04-26-2017 11:05 AM
#204
| |
I mean honestly banana, if you think "retard" is an acceptable word to use as an insult, but not "mong", then you're a stupid hypocrite. | |
| |
04-26-2017 11:32 AM
#205
| |
|
How. |
04-26-2017 12:23 PM
#206
| |
Calling someone a retard is a reference to those with learning difficulties. It's exactly as offensive as calling someone a mong (reference to down's syndrome) or a spastic (reference to cerebal palsy). | |
| |
04-26-2017 12:27 PM
#207
| |
| |
| |
04-26-2017 12:32 PM
#208
| |
| |
04-26-2017 01:23 PM
#209
| |
|
I think you're forgetting that when I call you a mong I want to hurt your feelings, this seems to have worked. Job done. |
04-26-2017 02:24 PM
#210
| |
| |
04-26-2017 03:15 PM
#211
| |
| |
04-26-2017 09:10 PM
#212
| |
|
I still say it sucks that Bill got fucked over. |