|
I think saying a 16/14 is nitty after 66 hands is a bit false. I usually run at like 22/18ish and there are lots of times I see myself with stats like that in a session.
If I give villain a 3bet calling range of something like {55-JJ, AJs+, AQo+, KJs+, KQo, QTs+, 78s+} that's 88 combos and I have 72% equity, of these hands
Combos that crush me
{9h9d, 9s9d, 9s9h, 8h8d, 8s8d, 8s8h, AcKc, 9h8h, 9d8d, 9s8s} (10) 11.79% equity
Flipping against
{AsKs, AhKc, AhKs, AcKs, AsKc} (5) 48.64% equity
Hands w/25-50% equity against me not already included.
{AcQc, AcJc, KcQc, KcJc, QcJc, QcTc, JhTh, JdTd, JsTs, Th9h, 8h7h} (11) 61.38% equity
Other hands villain will defend
{JJ, TT, KsQs, KsJs, KcQh, KcQd, KcQs, KsQh, KsQc, KsQd} (20) 84.46 equity
In total that's villain defending a total of 46 combos, 46/88 = 52.3% of his range.
Of the hands that villain isn't defending in that range the only hand he may be tempted to turn into a bluff would be AQo imo and I'm going to assume that villain isn't really the type to be bluffing all that often.
I also think that of the hands that I haven't chosen villain is going to be stretched to want to defend any wider. I also don't think villain is going to have any problems chasing his draws and calling his Kx, the only problem with sizing it big may be that I fold out TT & JJ. So I think a larger than usual c-bet is in order, about 60-65% would probably be best.
I'll have a think about at what point this sizing becomes bad as villain shoves more and more. It was kind of on the assumption villain only shoves about 10% (the crush range) but as more and more flushes are added to his range it may become bad.
|