I figure here might be a good place to post this.
I was doing some reviews in Hold'em Manager recently and noticed a trend. I have more big losses than I have big wins (mostly my fault), and my big losses tend to be more $s than my big wins.
At first I thought I was having trouble getting ai with my big hands, but no, 90% of my big hands are all in. Got me to thinking. Are people just more willing to gamble with their smaller stacks? Are people folding earlier in the hand with bigger stacks because of the threat of big bets later in the hand?
Makes me wonder whether I should be taking that into account. Like my range for getting ai v's 60bbs should be different than my range for getting ai with 120bbs. Actually written like that it seems obvious. Back to "Playing the Player" though, is this something fairly standard? I mean, I know theres exceptions. However generally speaking do you think its the case that bigger stacks fold more?