Does anybody have some links to decent articles or books on how to play satellites please?
Thanks in advance.
06-11-2016 10:15 PM
#1
| |
Satellite StratDoes anybody have some links to decent articles or books on how to play satellites please? | |
06-17-2016 10:37 PM
#2
| |
There is simply no good satellite strategy on the internet, period. | |
06-18-2016 05:17 AM
#3
| |
Thanks, will take a look. | |
06-18-2016 05:37 AM
#4
| |
| |
06-20-2016 10:34 AM
#5
| |
Yeah bubble of sats is the only time I can think where AA can be a legit fold pre flop. | |
Last edited by OngBonga; 06-20-2016 at 10:36 AM. | |
12-02-2016 06:15 AM
#6
| |
|
Satellites are similar to other MTTs with only one exception: ppl play much tighter in these from my observation |
12-06-2016 01:30 PM
#7
| |
They play vastly different at bubble. | |
| |
12-07-2016 08:06 AM
#8
| |
12-07-2016 08:08 AM
#9
| |
Just want to add that I think there is a much bigger edge in sats than mtts, because: | |
12-07-2016 09:17 AM
#10
| |
| |
12-08-2016 01:01 AM
#11
| |
| |
12-08-2016 09:16 AM
#12
| |
Yeah ok I shouldn't say it is a call, just that it can be, wheras in an MTT it's always a fold. Four to bust out in a sat, anything over 30bb is a safe stack, assuming the average is in the 10-20bb range. If I'm left with 50bb+ even when I lose, I'd be calling any two cards to a short stack shove, providing there's noone left to act. Folding would also be fine because it's not like it decreases our chances of busting. The example I give is =ev either way, because we're getting our ticket either way. I'd call it for the fun of it, to try and bust some poor sucker with my junk bb hand. Not the best example, granted, I'm simply trying to demonstrate that the MTTs and sats play differently at bubble depending on our stack size. | |
| |
12-23-2016 04:13 AM
#13
| |
|
Here is a 2-part article. I haven't personally read them, but part 1 of the article is by a guy that I believe is a skilled player. This is his Hendon Mob: |
Last edited by daredeviljo; 12-23-2016 at 04:16 AM. | |