|
Geez, these are based on super-small sample sizes (what happened on one particular hand), so I don't think this info is all that useful.
Some of the most profitable sets you list look somewhere between slightly non-optimal (e.g. K / JJ / AA instead of K / AA / JJ, which I think just has to be more profitable long-term) to outright stupid (e.g. QhQsQc / 6s7d / X 38, presumably after the first draw, which someone may have made a monster out of on that particular hand but will blow up the vast majority of the time). I don't see much value in looking at what set someone lucked into a monster in on one particular hand. I think it would be much more valuable to look at which sets led to the biggest royalties over thousands of hands. Anyone can get lucky once by taking a non-optimal line and hitting the perfect cards for it (such as putting the trip Q on top on the first draw above), but what will help you become a better player is looking at outcomes over large numbers of hands.
For example, in the other hand I cited (K / JJ / AA or K / AA / JJ), I could be wrong, but I'd have to a see a simulation of thousands of hands in which K / JJ / AA outperformed K / AA / JJ to convince me that it really is a better set.
|