What's your standard in spots like these? Should I just assume villain is an idiot and not pay off until proven otherwise or should I assume they're at least applying basic logic?
Example 1:
only 10 hands on villain, not sure when exactly this hand occurred in the 10.
Stacks:
UTG Hero ($98.70)
UTG+1 jerper ($52.75)
CO palnuts ($13.60)
BTN niirr10 ($23)
SB mspt ($52.75)
BB krajet ($100.20)
Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 6 players) Hero is UTG
Hero raises to $1.75, jerper calls $1.75, 1 fold, niirr10 calls $1.75, 1 fold, krajet calls $1.25
Flop: ($7.25, 4 players)
krajet checks, Hero bets $4, jerper raises to $12, 1 fold, krajet folds, Hero goes all-in $96.95
if he has 55/22 I don't expect him to raise like the driest board ever. K5s/K2s heavily discounted because I have a K and people don't usually flat with these hands (esp in MP vs UTG raises)
Example 2:
only 10 hands on villain
$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
FullTiltPoker
5 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG Kimlago ($80.40)
CO Pistolo14 ($16.50)
BTN ArghBlahr ($52.50)
SB ki191919 ($51.85)
BB Hero ($50)
Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 5 players) Hero is BB
3 folds, ki191919 raises to $1.50, Hero calls $1
Flop: ($3, 2 players)
ki191919 checks, Hero checks
Turn: ($3, 2 players)
ki191919 bets $0.50, Hero calls $0.50
River: ($4, 2 players)
ki191919 bets $9, Hero calls $9
He looks incredibly weak up until river and then he overbets? wtf is this?