How is he right?
How is he wrong?
05-20-2016 02:53 PM
#1
| |
The Principle of Non-aggression
| |
| |
05-20-2016 03:08 PM
#2
| |
The Principle of Non-aggression lol | |
| |
05-20-2016 05:11 PM
#3
| |
|
First problem: as he introduces the NAP, he equates what some societies teach their children about interaction amongst friends with interaction amongst enemies as well. Kids are NOT taught that violence is wrong; they're taught violence is wrong when conducted in certain ways. Two different things. |
05-20-2016 05:59 PM
#4
| |
Jesus Christ, does he ever get to the point? | |
| |
05-21-2016 07:02 AM
#5
| |
I thought he was pretty persuasive. He used a lot of stuff that I've used to make points but came to the opposite conclusion. | |
| |
05-21-2016 10:54 AM
#6
| |
|
Violence underlies everything. Offensive violence has a higher cost in free markets than it does for states, so there's less of it in free markets than in states. |
05-21-2016 11:40 AM
#7
| |
I understand the logic but history has innumerable examples of when theory meets reality and it's discovered that theory got step 1 right and missed on everything afterward. | |
| |
05-21-2016 11:58 AM
#8
| |
Is it violence to force another to submit to your demands? Sell me your business for x, or I will use all my resources to out compete and crush you. | |
05-21-2016 11:58 AM
#9
| |
|
States are subject to costs and benefits just like anything else. |
05-21-2016 12:08 PM
#10
| |
| |
05-21-2016 12:09 PM
#11
| |
| |
05-21-2016 12:50 PM
#12
| |
|
Everything is subject to costs and benefits. Most of the time, costs and benefits aren't explicitly in dollar signs. Economists try to think of this stuff in terms of dollars, though, since it allows for some level of quantification. |
05-28-2016 06:05 PM
#13
| |
im principly banging ur mom u bunch of aspie fuks | |
| |